Re: BPXPRMxx and FORKCOPY

2011-05-17 Thread Lizette Koehler
> > Don't know for certain, but I'd lay odds that it is the LE libraries. > > Most UNIX commands are written in C. Which requires LE to run. > > > > On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 11:33 -0400, Mark Jacobs wrote: > > > >> In the documentation for the FORKCOPY option in BPXPRMxx it says; > >> > >> If the runt

Re: BPXPRMxx and FORKCOPY

2011-05-17 Thread Mark Jacobs
Well CEE.SCEERUN and RUN2 are in the linklist while CEE.SCEELPA is in the lpalist. I'm still confused about this statement in the FM. Mark Jacobs On 05/16/11 19:46, John McKown wrote: Don't know for certain, but I'd lay odds that it is the LE libraries. Most UNIX commands are written in C. Whi

Re: BPXPRMxx and FORKCOPY

2011-05-16 Thread John McKown
Don't know for certain, but I'd lay odds that it is the LE libraries. Most UNIX commands are written in C. Which requires LE to run. On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 11:33 -0400, Mark Jacobs wrote: > In the documentation for the FORKCOPY option in BPXPRMxx it says; > > If the runtime library is in the link

BPXPRMxx and FORKCOPY

2011-05-16 Thread Mark Jacobs
In the documentation for the FORKCOPY option in BPXPRMxx it says; If the runtime library is in the link pack area, specify FORKCOPY(COPY). If the runtime library is not in the link pack area, specify FORKCOPY(COW). Which runtime library is it referring to? -- Mark Jacobs Time Customer Service T