In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 06/21/2007
at 01:13 PM, Barkow, Eileen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Was not the basis of VM/CMS to allow each user their own
self-contained operating system?
Even in the CP/67 days there were facilities for cooperation among
virtual machines. There was a time when I
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Staller, Allan
LOL,
To carry this argument to it's logical conclusion, each
application would have it's own OS
snip
Subject: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All
http://www.theregister.com/2007/06/20/usenix_07_opening_keynote/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
LOL,
To carry this argument to it's logical conclusion, each application
would have it's own OS
snip
Subject: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All
http://www.theregister.com/2007/06/20/usenix_07_opening_keynote/
/snip
Isn't that what they do today in the Windows world???
Claude Richbourg
Florida Department of Corrections
Systems Programmer III
850-921-1383
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Staller, Allan
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 8:18
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 07:18 -0500, Staller, Allan wrote:
LOL,
To carry this argument to it's logical conclusion, each application
would have it's own OS
M - must be that time of year again for a(nother) microkernel vs.
monolithic flame-fest.
Shane ...
In a message dated 6/21/2007 7:18:38 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To carry this argument to it's logical conclusion, each application
would have it's own OS
Isn't that how google works?
** See what's free at
John:
If you set your word marks properly, you did.
Bill
From: McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:17:44 -0500
On 21 Jun 2007 05:18:37 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Staller, Allan)
wrote:
LOL,
To carry this argument to it's logical conclusion, each application
would have it's own OS
We have been redefining OS, application, and programming language and
will continue to do so.
Java is a type of
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ken Brick) writes:
http://www.theregister.com/2007/06/20/usenix_07_opening_keynote/
the new, 40yr old theme, curtesy of the science center
Amen!
from my quote file:
a statement not only false in itself, but one which casts doubt on all
previous utterances from the same source. - H.P. Herbert q.Peter
Hebblethwaite _NCR_92May8p14
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 06/21/2007
09:17:44 AM:
RIGHT!
To carry this argument to it's logical conclusion, each application
would have it's own OS
It would be better to say that each application would have to include much
of the operating suystem function within it.
That would be too much to expect, especially with complex OS functions like
On 21 Jun 2007 09:11:31 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
To carry this argument to it's logical conclusion, each application
would have it's own OS
It would be better to say that each application would have to include much
of the operating suystem function within it.
That would
Was not the basis of VM/CMS to allow each user their own self-contained
operating system?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 12:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Off Topic But
---snip
Was not the basis of VM/CMS to allow each user their own self-contained
operating system?
---unsnip--
Yes and no. You could change parameters (sometimes) but the code was all
contained in a shared segment of
On 21 Jun 2007 10:13:22 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Was not the basis of VM/CMS to allow each user their own self-contained
operating system?
VM also gives other advantages which could be useful to be copied
here.
McKown, John wrote:
And its own
customized mathematics subroutine library.
Gee, didn't we have this with the 1401?
I seem to recall the mathematical subroutine library on the 1401
a little wanting G
Gerhard Postpischil
Bradford, VT
new e-mail address: gerhardp (at) charter (dot) net
17 matches
Mail list logo