In a recent note, Lizette Koehler said:
> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 09:01:57 -0700
>
> One thing I usually do with STCs that fail, is to run the STC JCL as a batch
> job. It would not matter if the job failed, but I would be able to see if
> there were any data sets that were not valid or if
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 11:30:53 -0700, Paul Gilmartin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>This technique is far less effective if the STC JCL contains system
>symbols. There's another good argument here for supporting symbols
>in batch JCL.
>...
For that kind of test it's a whole lot faster to stick so
In a recent note, Patrick O'Keefe said:
> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 14:18:55 -0600
>
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 11:30:53 -0700, Paul Gilmartin
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> >This technique is far less effective if the STC JCL contains system
> >symbols. There's another good argument here for
3 matches
Mail list logo