> In my opinion the problem with the OP's post is more that he apparently
> thinks that BASH in and of itself will compromise z/OS security.
No, that's not at all what I'm thinking! "Shell shock" has just been the
trigger to open the long due requirement.
If we offer some piece of software to o
> ... So I guess that integrating BASH into the "Ported Tools" and including ...
I the requirement states: "... as part of z/OS ... or at least of the z/OS
Ported Tools package). I don't care, all I want is to be able to open a PMR and
get a fix if that is needed.
--Peter Hunkeler
--
> Just my opinion, but since BASH is a port of open source software, I don't
> think it can ever be incorporated into USS.
I thought IBM has been delivering BASH as part of AIX for over a decade now,
don't they?
--Peter Hunkeler
---
> I will point out a "textual error" in the request. The fourth paragraph ...
Thanks, John. I don't seem to be able to edit the text, but I have just added a
comment to clarify this.
--Peter Hunkeler
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / s
