@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin [000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 11:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Friday Follies/Why won't this work?/TSO Rant #387
On Sun, 24 May 2020 18:26:13 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>...
>+1
On Sun, 24 May 2020 18:26:13 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>...
>+1 (What the H*** is gained by uppercasing a CART where the underlying
>service supports any 64-bit value? Don't over validate! This is the problem
>with various utilities that could handle UNIX files except that the utility
smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Charles Mills [charl...@mcn.org]
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 9:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Friday Follies/Why won't this work?/TSO Rant #387
+1 (SUBMIT)
+1 (Doc)
+1 (What
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Friday Follies/Why won't this work?/TSO Rant #387
On Mon, 25 May 2020 00:53:04 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>Never mind case; when will SUBMIT recognize that 80 is not the only integer?
>
>Also, when TSO (sub)commands upper case their input, the documentati
ubject: Re: Friday Follies/Why won't this work?/TSO Rant #387
On Sun, 24 May 2020 14:26:51 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>
>'MyCart01' (as written, in camel-case) was my intended CART and it is a
valid CART: a CART may have any 64-bit value. The problem was that the
CONSOLE command uppercased it
On Mon, 25 May 2020 00:53:04 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>Never mind case; when will SUBMIT recognize that 80 is not the only integer?
>
>Also, when TSO (sub)commands upper case their input, the documentation should
>say so in an obvious location as part of the (sub)command description.
>
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin [000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 7:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Friday Follies/Why won't this work?/TSO
On Sun, 24 May 2020 14:26:51 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>
>'MyCart01' (as written, in camel-case) was my intended CART and it is a valid
>CART: a CART may have any 64-bit value. The problem was that the CONSOLE
>command uppercased it to MYCART01. Yes, had I written my Rexx in such a way as
>to
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Charles Mills [charl...@mcn.org]
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 5:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Friday Follies/Why won't this work?/TSO Rant #387
The problem was NOT that Rexx (or my coding style) failed to uppercase an
operand; the problem was that TSO did
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Seymour J Metz
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2020 11:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Friday Follies/Why won't this work?/TSO Rant #387
> You seem stuck on this capitalization thing.
You seem to forget t
hs.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020 1:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Friday Follies/Why won't this work?/TSO Rant #387
Metz wrote:
>Well, I've only been using REXX for 35 years. The problems that I have seen
>from not quoting words have been few and far between, not ne
Metz wrote:
>Well, I've only been using REXX for 35 years. The problems that I have seen
>from not quoting words have been few and far between, not nearly as many as,
>e.g., problems related to continuation, omitting a period in a stem, incorrect
>capitalization in a string literal.
You
(Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Phil Smith III [li...@akphs.com]
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 8:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Friday Follies/Why won't
t;>
> >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on
> behalf
> >> of Steve Smith [sasd...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 3:00 PM
> >> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> >> Su
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf
of Steve Smith [sasd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 3:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Friday Follies/Why won't this work?/TSO Rant #387
Case sensitivity is the root of all
Slight diversion. A colleague wanted some REXX code so I sent it as an XMIT
file. He was working remotely and said, the RECEIVE fails.
When I next saw him, I went to his desk and watched the RECEIVE command.
Boom, "UNABLE TO ALLOCATE LOG.MISC".
He had TSO PROFILE(NOPREFIX) and didn't have RACF
led
labels that the interpreter may miss.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Phil Smith III
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 5:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Friday Follies/Why won't this work?/TSO Rant #387
Metz wrote:
> Running with signal on novalue and quoting everything leads to hard-to-debug
> surprises errors when you get the case wrong (present
example is typical.) ;-)
After almost 40 years of writing Rexx, I've never had that problem. Quoting
literals avoids far more problems than it
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Charles Mills [charl...@mcn.org]
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 4:56 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Friday Follies/Why won't this work?/TSO Rant #387
True enough, but in my (actual) Rexx programs I always code Signal On
Novalue. To do otherwise
Metz
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 12:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Friday Follies/Why won't this work?/TSO Rant #387
Hence my quote: had he not quoted the value then it would have been a symbol
and REXX would have translated it to upper case
] on behalf of
Robert Garrett [rob...@garrettfamily.us]
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 1:45 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Friday Follies/Why won't this work?/TSO Rant #387
Your problem is caused by using lower case characters in your CART parameter
value, the value of variable MyCart. If you
h [sasd...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 3:00 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Friday Follies/Why won't this work?/TSO Rant #387
>
> Case sensitivity is the root of all evil.
>
> sas
>
> Disclaimer: The above may contain excessive generalization,
Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Steve Smith [sasd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 3:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Friday Follies/Why won't this work?/TSO Rant #387
Case sensitivity is the root of all evil.
sas
Disclaimer: The above may contain
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Friday Follies/Why won't this work?/TSO Rant #387
We have a winner! You've got it about 90%.
The clue is in the subject line -- this is actually a TSO rant.
TSO uppercases commands so "CART" MyCart becomes effectively "CART
MYCART01".
G
Case sensitivity is the root of all evil.
sas
Disclaimer: The above may contain excessive generalization, hyperbole, and
offend your sensibilities. I'd say I'm sorry, but that would just add
flat-out lying to the mix.
--
For
ot;TSOEXEC CONSOLE ACTIVATE NAME("con_name") CART("Cart_V")"
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of Charles Mills
> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 1:53 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Friday F
ould solve the problem by quoting the CART
but I have not tested. Something like "CART" "'"||MyCart||"'" .
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Robert Garrett
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 10:
ot;'"||MyCart||"'" .
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Robert Garrett
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 10:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Friday Follies/Why won't this work?/TSO Rant #387
Y
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 11:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Friday Follies/Why won't this work?/TSO Rant #387
I called my congressman and he said quote
I'd like to help you son, but you're too young
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Friday Follies/Why won't this work?/TSO Rant #387
Charles ,
I was incorrect here:
READY
CONSPROF SOLDISP(NO) SOLNUM(400)
CONSOLE ACTIVATE
CONSOLE SYSCMD($S PRT1) CART('PRT10001')
CONSOLE SYSCMD($S PRT2) CART('PRT20002')
EXEC MY.EXEC(CHKPRT) 'PRT10001
Nope.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Richards, Robert B.
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 9:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Friday Follies/Why won't this work?/TSO Rant #387
If I turn on HILITE
of debug struggle!).
>>
>> Charles
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
>> Behalf Of Joe Monk
>> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 9:07 AM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>>
uot; I know the answer
> (after 2+ hours of debug struggle!).
>
> Charles
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Joe Monk
> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 9:07 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
&g
If I turn on HILITE, will the answer become apparent?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Charles Mills
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 12:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Friday Follies/Why won't this work?/TSO Rant #387
Message handling
ssion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Joe Monk
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 9:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Friday Follies/Why won't this work?/TSO Rant #387
Check your message handling ...
Joe
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 11:00 AM Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
>
Nope, it is fine.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Richards, Robert B.
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 8:19 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Friday Follies/Why won't this work?/TSO Rant #387
Address
ttp://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf
> of Charles Mills [charl...@mcn.org]
> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 10:02 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Friday Follies/Why
Mills [charl...@mcn.org]
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 10:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Friday Follies/Why won't this work?/TSO Rant #387
What is wrong with this Rexx? (I spent about two hours debugging before I
solved it.) The problem is right here on this page: the answer
Address Console in wrong location?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Charles Mills
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 10:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Friday Follies/Why won't this work?/TSO Rant #387
What is wrong with this Rexx? (I spent about
What is wrong with this Rexx? (I spent about two hours debugging before I
solved it.) The problem is right here on this page: the answer is NOT
something in RACF or JES2. It's not something missing: it's a sin of
commission, not a sin of omission. The below will never work. That is, the
output
40 matches
Mail list logo