Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes

2007-01-14 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 2007-01-13 12:32, Adrian Farrel wrote: Hey, I had promised to keep out of this having already used my quota of emails for the months, but then Fred said... That said, I _do_ wish the tracker would maintain history of DISCUSS and COMMENT comments, instead of only showing the latest ballot

Re: addressing Last Call comments [Re: "Discuss" criteria]

2007-01-14 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 2007-01-12 09:54, Pekka Savola wrote: Well, it seems rather common that IETF LC comments (especially if not copied to ietf@ietf.org list) are not responded. Firstly, this is the reason we recently made some minor changes in the text of the IETF Last Call messages, and why you will see a r

Re: Last Call: draft-legg-xed-asd (Abstract Syntax Notation X(ASN.X)) to Proposed Standard

2007-01-14 Thread Simon Josefsson
"Randy Presuhn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi - > >> From: "Simon Josefsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "Joel M. Halpern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; >> Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 12:38 PM >> Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-legg-xed-asd (Abstract Syntax Notation >> X(A

Re: Last Call: draft-legg-xed-asd (Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)) to Proposed Standard

2007-01-14 Thread Simon Josefsson
"Steven M. Bellovin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And as you very well know, the IPR working group is fixing the > problem. I think a pointer to the archives there would have sufficed > (or at least a mention of the discussion and status). The mailing list archives doesn't contain a clear descr

Last Call comment destination (Re: addressing Last Call comments [Re: "Discuss" criteria])

2007-01-14 Thread Spencer Dawkins
Just a minor followup here... From a Brian-o-gram: IETF LC comments are supposed to be sent to the IETF list, which has a public archive (or exceptionally to the iesg). Maybe we should be clearer on what the expectation for processing IETF LC comments is. Unless we do, it is not obvious h

Re: addressing Last Call comments [Re: "Discuss" criteria]

2007-01-14 Thread David Kessens
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 09:31:29AM +0100, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > On 2007-01-12 09:54, Pekka Savola wrote: > > That depends on the AD's judgement whether the comments are serious > enough to definitely require a new I-D. Quite often the AD will prefer > to get any DISCUSSes on the table at t

Re: Last Call comment destination (Re: addressing Last Call comments [Re: "Discuss" criteria])

2007-01-14 Thread Brian E Carpenter
I haven't seen an announcement of the new-style Last Call text, only its use on specific recent last calls (I saw it on 12/22 Last Calls, so it's pretty recent). If you have also seen so many Last Call e-mails that you no longer actually read them, you might not have noticed the new text that