On 2007-01-13 12:32, Adrian Farrel wrote:
Hey, I had promised to keep out of this having already used my quota of
emails for the months, but then Fred said...
That said, I _do_ wish the tracker would maintain history of DISCUSS
and COMMENT comments, instead of only showing the latest ballot
On 2007-01-12 09:54, Pekka Savola wrote:
Well, it seems rather common that IETF LC comments (especially if not
copied to ietf@ietf.org list) are not responded.
Firstly, this is the reason we recently made some minor changes
in the text of the IETF Last Call messages, and why you will see a
r
"Randy Presuhn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi -
>
>> From: "Simon Josefsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "Joel M. Halpern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
>> Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 12:38 PM
>> Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-legg-xed-asd (Abstract Syntax Notation
>> X(A
"Steven M. Bellovin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And as you very well know, the IPR working group is fixing the
> problem. I think a pointer to the archives there would have sufficed
> (or at least a mention of the discussion and status).
The mailing list archives doesn't contain a clear descr
Just a minor followup here...
From a Brian-o-gram:
IETF LC comments are supposed to be sent to the IETF list, which has a
public archive (or exceptionally to the iesg).
Maybe we should be clearer on what the expectation for processing IETF LC
comments is. Unless we do, it is not obvious h
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 09:31:29AM +0100, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>
> On 2007-01-12 09:54, Pekka Savola wrote:
>
> That depends on the AD's judgement whether the comments are serious
> enough to definitely require a new I-D. Quite often the AD will prefer
> to get any DISCUSSes on the table at t
I haven't seen an announcement of the new-style Last Call text, only its
use on specific recent last calls (I saw it on 12/22 Last Calls, so it's
pretty recent). If you have also seen so many Last Call e-mails that you
no longer actually read them, you might not have noticed the new text
that