RE: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-smime-sha2-03.txt

Spencer, Thanks for taking the time to read the draft. Responses are inline. spt >-Original Message- >From: Spencer Dawkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 12:27 AM >To: General Area Review Team >Cc: Sean Turner; Blake Ramsdell; ietf@ietf.org; [EMAIL PROTECTE

FW: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-rfc4346-bis (The TransportLayer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2) to Proposed Standard

I should have CC'd IETF on the following. (Thanks Nelson.) --mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Brown Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 2:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-rfc4346-bis (The Tran

Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sipping-pending-additions-04.txt

Gonzalo, I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. D

RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-sha2 (Using SHA2 Algorithms withCryptographic Message Syntax) to Proposed Standard

Denis, Thanks for taking the time to review this ID. Responses are inline. spt >-Original Message- > >There are obvious errors (intentionnaly left by the editor in >order to know how many people read the document). If I was going to leave something intentionally in the document to see

Gen-art review of draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-11.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document:

RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-sha2 (Using SHA2 Algorithms withCryptographic Message Syntax) to Proposed Standard

At 4:06 PM -0500 2/29/08, Turner, Sean P. wrote: > >In addition, it is not acceptable to reference in the >>*normative* references "work in progess", i.e.[ECCADD]. > >I'm pretty sure this is done all the time. There are 17 IDs in the RFC >editor queue with works-in-progress in normative references

Discussion about Federated Roaming

Hello! My name is Stefan Winter of the National Research and Education Network in Luxembourg, RESTENA. We are an ISP for academia and take the lead in research and development of a global academic wireless LAN federated roaming consortium: "eduroam". This is based on EAP and 802.1X exclusively.