Separate budgets, but it really all depends on the type of "Trade
Shows" the IETF is contemplating. I will note it does spike my
interest to consider going to a IETF event from a technical sales
standpoint, illustrating products built on IETF standardized protocol
efforts, developing technology
On 3/16/2012 11:10 PM, Joel jaeggli wrote:
PMO or whatever it's called in given organzation is a different pool of
money.
+1
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
--On Friday, March 16, 2012 21:28 -0700 Joel jaeggli
wrote:
> On 3/16/12 20:04 , John C Klensin wrote:
>> Note too that, if the company sends only five technical people
>> and concludes that it doesn't suffer harm from that small a
>> number, the odds of getting back up to 10 if the experiment
On 3/16/12 21:28 , Joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 3/16/12 20:04 , John C Klensin wrote:
>> Note too that, if the company sends only five technical people
>> and concludes that it doesn't suffer harm from that small a
>> number, the odds of getting back up to 10 if the experiment is
>> terminated and thos
On 3/16/12 20:04 , John C Klensin wrote:
> Note too that, if the company sends only five technical people
> and concludes that it doesn't suffer harm from that small a
> number, the odds of getting back up to 10 if the experiment is
> terminated and those five sales/market types disappear is just
>
On 3/16/2012 8:04 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
Suppose we offer them a
show floor or equivalent and they decide they need to send five
market or sales folk to staff it.
wow. that's very creative thinking John.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
--On Friday, March 16, 2012 17:49 -0800 Melinda Shore
wrote:
>...
> No harm in looking at it, though. Questions about what it
> would
> offer that participants would find useful (other than beer).
Not to pick on Melinda (her note was just handy), but I want to
push back a bit on the "no harm
On 3/16/12 3:32 PM, David Morris wrote:
I find my self needing downtime when I attend an IETF meeting.
Me too, and while I'm pro-beer I'm ambivalent about gear. I
don't really understand what would be in it for any of the
parties involved.
No harm in looking at it, though. Questions about wh
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "IAOC" == IAOC Chair writes:
>
> IAOC> QUESTION: What do you think about doing a Beer and Gear
> IAOC> style of event on an evening that does not conflict with other
> IAOC> IETF activities?
>
> I think that hallway conversations,
--On Friday, March 16, 2012 16:35 -0400 Sam Hartman
wrote:
> IAOC> QUESTION: What do you think about doing a Beer and
> Gear IAOC> style of event on an evening that does not
> conflict with other IAOC> IETF activities?
>
> I think that hallway conversations, private meetings and
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012, Russ Housley wrote:
> Thursday is gone, we have given the host the Monday lunch slot. So,
> there are no more slots in Paris. But is also shows that we could
> probably get sponsorship dollars for the Monday lunch slot on an ongoing
> basis.
Another slot to consider ... br
Andy:
> On 03/16/2012 01:35 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>
>> IAOC>QUESTION: What do you think about doing a Beer and Gear
>> IAOC> style of event on an evening that does not conflict with other
>> IAOC> IETF activities?
>>
>> I think that hallway conversations, private meetings and
On 03/16/2012 01:35 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
"IAOC" == IAOC Chair writes:
IAOC>QUESTION: What do you think about doing a Beer and Gear
IAOC> style of event on an evening that does not conflict with other
IAOC> IETF activities?
I think that hallway conversations, private mee
> "IAOC" == IAOC Chair writes:
IAOC> QUESTION: What do you think about doing a Beer and Gear
IAOC> style of event on an evening that does not conflict with other
IAOC> IETF activities?
I think that hallway conversations, private meetings and other
activities that people have al
14 matches
Mail list logo
