Yes, no visible impact.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> So to make sure I understood that, this has no visible impact on the
> functionality of API methods, correct? Like any get operation would
> successfully retrieve a remote entry if one exists somewhere?
>
> On 5 Dec
So to make sure I understood that, this has no visible impact on the
functionality of API methods, correct? Like any get operation would
successfully retrieve a remote entry if one exists somewhere?
On 5 December 2012 15:42, Dan Berindei wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Sanne Grinovero
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> On 5 December 2012 14:01, Bela Ban wrote:
> >
> > On 12/5/12 1:23 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> >> On 5 December 2012 11:02, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
> >>> On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Sanne Grinovero
> wrote:
> >>>
> On 4 December 201
On 5 December 2012 14:01, Bela Ban wrote:
>
> On 12/5/12 1:23 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>> On 5 December 2012 11:02, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>>> On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>>>
On 4 December 2012 09:14, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
> Hey Dan/Adrian,
>
> Re:
On 12/5/12 1:23 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> On 5 December 2012 11:02, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>> On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>>
>>> On 4 December 2012 09:14, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
Hey Dan/Adrian,
Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2541
I
On Dec 5, 2012, at 1:23 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> On 5 December 2012 11:02, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>>
>>> On 4 December 2012 09:14, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
Hey Dan/Adrian,
Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-
On 5 December 2012 11:02, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>
> On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>
>> On 4 December 2012 09:14, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>>> Hey Dan/Adrian,
>>>
>>> Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2541
>>>
>>> I'm looking at this intermittent failure, and it seem
On Dec 4, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Dan Berindei wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Mircea Markus wrote:
>
> On 4 Dec 2012, at 09:22, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>
>> [...]
>>
>> I don't think the cache should ever be in an illegal state to be used
>> after being started. So Infinispan should
On 12/5/12 12:06 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Bela Ban wrote:
>
>> If a node A connects to B and B connects to A at the exact same time
>> (and there wasn't any existing connection between the 2 nodes, then one
>> of the 2 will 'win' and the other one will close its
On Dec 4, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Bela Ban wrote:
>
>
> On 12/4/12 11:30 AM, Dan Berindei wrote:
>> BTW, I also got an exception yesterday in MarshallExternalPojosTest and
>> I investigated it, but in my case the error was much weirder: two nodes
>> both opened a TCP connection to each other, yet n
On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> On 4 December 2012 09:14, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>> Hey Dan/Adrian,
>>
>> Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2541
>>
>> I'm looking at this intermittent failure, and it seems to be caused by the
>> fact that the test does not wait
On 12/4/12 11:30 AM, Dan Berindei wrote:
> BTW, I also got an exception yesterday in MarshallExternalPojosTest and
> I investigated it, but in my case the error was much weirder: two nodes
> both opened a TCP connection to each other, yet none of them received
> the forwarded command. I've asked
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Mircea Markus wrote:
>
> On 4 Dec 2012, at 09:22, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> I don't think the cache should ever be in an illegal state to be used
> after being started. So Infinispan should not require tests to wait
> for a "cluster to be formed", I'd r
On 4 Dec 2012, at 09:22, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> [...]
>
> I don't think the cache should ever be in an illegal state to be used
> after being started. So Infinispan should not require tests to wait
> for a "cluster to be formed", I'd rather guarantee that after a cache
> is started it's usable
On 4 December 2012 09:14, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
> Hey Dan/Adrian,
>
> Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2541
>
> I'm looking at this intermittent failure, and it seems to be caused by the
> fact that the test does not wait for the cluster to be formed when the new
> node is started, whi
Hey Dan/Adrian,
Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2541
I'm looking at this intermittent failure, and it seems to be caused by the fact
that the test does not wait for the cluster to be formed when the new node is
started, which can lead a replication timeout failure from the new joining
16 matches
Mail list logo