Re: [infinispan-dev] Put issues with newly joining node

2012-12-05 Thread Dan Berindei
Yes, no visible impact. On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > So to make sure I understood that, this has no visible impact on the > functionality of API methods, correct? Like any get operation would > successfully retrieve a remote entry if one exists somewhere? > > On 5 Dec

Re: [infinispan-dev] Put issues with newly joining node

2012-12-05 Thread Sanne Grinovero
So to make sure I understood that, this has no visible impact on the functionality of API methods, correct? Like any get operation would successfully retrieve a remote entry if one exists somewhere? On 5 December 2012 15:42, Dan Berindei wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Sanne Grinovero

Re: [infinispan-dev] Put issues with newly joining node

2012-12-05 Thread Dan Berindei
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > On 5 December 2012 14:01, Bela Ban wrote: > > > > On 12/5/12 1:23 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > >> On 5 December 2012 11:02, Galder Zamarreño wrote: > >>> On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Sanne Grinovero > wrote: > >>> > On 4 December 201

Re: [infinispan-dev] Put issues with newly joining node

2012-12-05 Thread Sanne Grinovero
On 5 December 2012 14:01, Bela Ban wrote: > > On 12/5/12 1:23 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: >> On 5 December 2012 11:02, Galder Zamarreño wrote: >>> On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: >>> On 4 December 2012 09:14, Galder Zamarreño wrote: > Hey Dan/Adrian, > > Re:

Re: [infinispan-dev] Put issues with newly joining node

2012-12-05 Thread Bela Ban
On 12/5/12 1:23 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > On 5 December 2012 11:02, Galder Zamarreño wrote: >> On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: >> >>> On 4 December 2012 09:14, Galder Zamarreño wrote: Hey Dan/Adrian, Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2541 I

Re: [infinispan-dev] Put issues with newly joining node

2012-12-05 Thread Galder Zamarreño
On Dec 5, 2012, at 1:23 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > On 5 December 2012 11:02, Galder Zamarreño wrote: >> >> On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: >> >>> On 4 December 2012 09:14, Galder Zamarreño wrote: Hey Dan/Adrian, Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-

Re: [infinispan-dev] Put issues with newly joining node

2012-12-05 Thread Sanne Grinovero
On 5 December 2012 11:02, Galder Zamarreño wrote: > > On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > >> On 4 December 2012 09:14, Galder Zamarreño wrote: >>> Hey Dan/Adrian, >>> >>> Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2541 >>> >>> I'm looking at this intermittent failure, and it seem

Re: [infinispan-dev] Put issues with newly joining node

2012-12-05 Thread Galder Zamarreño
On Dec 4, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Dan Berindei wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Mircea Markus wrote: > > On 4 Dec 2012, at 09:22, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > >> [...] >> >> I don't think the cache should ever be in an illegal state to be used >> after being started. So Infinispan should

Re: [infinispan-dev] Put issues with newly joining node

2012-12-05 Thread Bela Ban
On 12/5/12 12:06 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote: > On Dec 4, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Bela Ban wrote: > >> If a node A connects to B and B connects to A at the exact same time >> (and there wasn't any existing connection between the 2 nodes, then one >> of the 2 will 'win' and the other one will close its

Re: [infinispan-dev] Put issues with newly joining node

2012-12-05 Thread Galder Zamarreño
On Dec 4, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Bela Ban wrote: > > > On 12/4/12 11:30 AM, Dan Berindei wrote: >> BTW, I also got an exception yesterday in MarshallExternalPojosTest and >> I investigated it, but in my case the error was much weirder: two nodes >> both opened a TCP connection to each other, yet n

Re: [infinispan-dev] Put issues with newly joining node

2012-12-05 Thread Galder Zamarreño
On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > On 4 December 2012 09:14, Galder Zamarreño wrote: >> Hey Dan/Adrian, >> >> Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2541 >> >> I'm looking at this intermittent failure, and it seems to be caused by the >> fact that the test does not wait

Re: [infinispan-dev] Put issues with newly joining node

2012-12-04 Thread Bela Ban
On 12/4/12 11:30 AM, Dan Berindei wrote: > BTW, I also got an exception yesterday in MarshallExternalPojosTest and > I investigated it, but in my case the error was much weirder: two nodes > both opened a TCP connection to each other, yet none of them received > the forwarded command. I've asked

Re: [infinispan-dev] Put issues with newly joining node

2012-12-04 Thread Dan Berindei
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Mircea Markus wrote: > > On 4 Dec 2012, at 09:22, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > > [...] > > I don't think the cache should ever be in an illegal state to be used > after being started. So Infinispan should not require tests to wait > for a "cluster to be formed", I'd r

Re: [infinispan-dev] Put issues with newly joining node

2012-12-04 Thread Mircea Markus
On 4 Dec 2012, at 09:22, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > [...] > > I don't think the cache should ever be in an illegal state to be used > after being started. So Infinispan should not require tests to wait > for a "cluster to be formed", I'd rather guarantee that after a cache > is started it's usable

Re: [infinispan-dev] Put issues with newly joining node

2012-12-04 Thread Sanne Grinovero
On 4 December 2012 09:14, Galder Zamarreño wrote: > Hey Dan/Adrian, > > Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2541 > > I'm looking at this intermittent failure, and it seems to be caused by the > fact that the test does not wait for the cluster to be formed when the new > node is started, whi

[infinispan-dev] Put issues with newly joining node

2012-12-04 Thread Galder Zamarreño
Hey Dan/Adrian, Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2541 I'm looking at this intermittent failure, and it seems to be caused by the fact that the test does not wait for the cluster to be formed when the new node is started, which can lead a replication timeout failure from the new joining