Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> On 09/25/01 08:06 AM, Jeremy Howard sat at the `puter and typed:
> > Q: Why isn't plussed addressing working?
> >
> > A: There are 3 possible reasons:
> > * [anyone p] not set on subfolder
> Check: not the problem
>
> > * subfolder is not all lowercase
> Check: not the pro
Roland Pope wrote:
>
> From what I can tell from scanning through the mail archives, it would appear
> that you cannot force an overquota delivery when using LMTP with cyrus 2.0.??.
> What is required here to implement this? Do the MTA's need to support the
> IGNOREQUOTA draft rfc?
Pretty much
Hi,
When testing sieve, I tried to connect via telnet to the sieve port:
telnet localhost sieve
the problem is that the following appears in /var/log/messages:
Sep 25 20:48:38 coral service-sieve[29311]: executed
Sep 25 20:48:38 coral service-sieve[29311]: unable to set close on exec:
Bad fil
>From what I can tell from scanning through the mail archives, it would appear
that you cannot force an overquota delivery when using LMTP with cyrus 2.0.??.
What is required here to implement this? Do the MTA's need to support the
IGNOREQUOTA draft rfc?
What functionality do I loose, other than n
On 09/25/01 08:17 AM, Jim Levie sat at the `puter and typed:
> . . .
> I know of a 4th reason, that being that virtusertable is in use. There
> may be some way around it, but everytime I use virtusertable it kills
> subfolder delivery.
Not using it.
Thanks anyway.
L
--
Louis LeBlanc [EMA
Done.
Ken
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I discovered a bug in lib/util.c of the CVS version of cyrus-imapd-2.0.16.
> It only causes trouble if you configure Cyrus with the improved directory
> hashing and enable hashed spool directories. The result of the bug is that
> subfolders hash into dif
I discovered a bug in lib/util.c of the CVS version of cyrus-imapd-2.0.16.
It only causes trouble if you configure Cyrus with the improved directory
hashing and enable hashed spool directories. The result of the bug is that
subfolders hash into different hash directories than the INBOX. The fix
On Mon, 2001-09-24 at 17:06, Jeremy Howard wrote:
> Q: Why isn't plussed addressing working?
>
> A: There are 3 possible reasons:
> * [anyone p] not set on subfolder
> * subfolder is not all lowercase
> * Sieve includes an explict rule to deliver to INBOX
I know of a 4th reason, that being that
On 09/25/01 08:06 AM, Jeremy Howard sat at the `puter and typed:
> Q: Why isn't plussed addressing working?
>
> A: There are 3 possible reasons:
> * [anyone p] not set on subfolder
Check: not the problem
> * subfolder is not all lowercase
Check: not the problem
> * Sieve includes an explict r
Hi list,
I'm sorry, but I am not sure if thi is OT or OT. :)
I am having problems where postfix does not deliver to all recipients if the
message has multiple recepients. This does not always happen, but sometimes (I
daresay almost always). Has anyone experienced similar problems?
All tips ar
10 matches
Mail list logo