On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 08:48:17PM +0200, dcaro wrote:
On 06/16, Eyal Edri wrote:
Sounds like a bug.
Jenkins should only use the CI flag and not change CR and V flags.
Might have been a misunderstanding.
David, can you fix it so Jenkins will only update CI flag?
Can someone pass me
I just rolled out the CI flag to all the projects this morning, restricting
jenkins to set only that flag, did that happen again after it?
On 06/17, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 08:48:17PM +0200, dcaro wrote:
On 06/16, Eyal Edri wrote:
Sounds like a bug.
Jenkins should
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 03:05:52PM +0200, dcaro wrote:
I just rolled out the CI flag to all the projects this morning, restricting
jenkins to set only that flag, did that happen again after it?
No, all seems clear now. Thanks.
___
Infra mailing list
As of yesterday, Jenkins CI starting granting CR+1, V+1 and CI+1 for
every patchset that it successfully passed.
Was this change somehow intentional?
It is confusing and unwanted. Only a human developer can give a
meaningful Code-Review. Only a human user/QE can say that a patch solved
the
: ee...@redhat.com; dc...@redhat.com
Subject: Jenkins CI granting excessive +1s
As of yesterday, Jenkins CI starting granting CR+1, V+1 and CI+1 for
every patchset that it successfully passed.
Was this change somehow intentional?
It is confusing and unwanted. Only a human developer can give
have the ci flag
we can't enforce it globally.
E.
Eyal Edri
Supervisor, RHEV CI
Red Hat
From: Dan Kenigsberg
Sent: Jun 16, 2015 7:06 PM
To: infra@ovirt.org
Cc: ee...@redhat.com; dc...@redhat.com
Subject: Jenkins CI granting excessive +1s
As of yesterday, Jenkins CI starting granting