Dne 03. 12. 19 v 11:34 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
>> can't we just point them to the nagios
>> page?
> That is great idea. And to have there link to outage calendar as well.
I sent a PR and you can see it live now at:
https://status.fedoraproject.org/
Thanks Mikolai for qui
> People are not checking status pages when everything is working :)
Sure...
> IMO is is pretty fine to have something yellow (or even red) despite the
> fact, that it seems to operate just fine for
> end user.
well, I take an entry on status to mean 'it's known, we are working on
fixing it' bu
Dne 30. 11. 19 v 21:31 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> can't we just point them to the nagios
> page?
That is great idea. And to have there link to outage calendar as well.
> But how do you map those?
> Some examples:
>
> * If a mirrorlist alerts as down that does not mean the service is down
> to
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 03:57:11PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 28. 11. 19 v 1:29 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> > I am missing what capabilities you are wanting it to
> > have?
>
> * current page shows "Everything is OK" even when some service does not work.
> I would at least expect some orange
Dne 28. 11. 19 v 1:29 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> I am missing what capabilities you are wanting it to
> have?
* current page shows "Everything is OK" even when some service does not work. I
would at least expect some orange text
"There seems to be some problems, not acknowledged by admins yet".
* I
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 08:44:15AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 3:06 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> > For long time, I plan to do something about
> > https://status.fedoraproject.org/
> >
> > I think that manual up
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 3:06 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Hi.
> For long time, I plan to do something about
> https://status.fedoraproject.org/
>
> I think that manual updates of this page does not reflect the capabilities of
> these century.
>
> My question is: d
Hi.
For long time, I plan to do something about
https://status.fedoraproject.org/
I think that manual updates of this page does not reflect the capabilities of
these century.
My question is: do we want to go SasS way? I found
https://www.statusdashboard.com/pricing
which would cost us $99
On 28 August 2012 15:52, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 15:41:31 -0600,
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> I'm about ready to announce status.fedoraproject.org for folks to start
>> using.
>>
>> If everyone could take a minute and check out th
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:52:28 -0500
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 15:41:31 -0600,
>Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >I'm about ready to announce status.fedoraproject.org for folks to
> >start using.
> >
> >If everyone could take a minute and check ou
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 15:41:31 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I'm about ready to announce status.fedoraproject.org for folks to start
using.
If everyone could take a minute and check out the current version and
see if there are services we forgot, or services we should remove or
wordi
On 28 August 2012 15:41, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I'm about ready to announce status.fedoraproject.org for folks to start
> using.
>
> If everyone could take a minute and check out the current version and
> see if there are services we forgot, or services we should remove or
I'm about ready to announce status.fedoraproject.org for folks to start
using.
If everyone could take a minute and check out the current version and
see if there are services we forgot, or services we should remove or
wording we should change, that would be great.
13 matches
Mail list logo