On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:17:34AM +0530, Jindal, Sonika wrote:
>
>
> On 6/23/2015 4:42 PM, David Weinehall wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 05:05:21PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:50:33PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
> >>>@@ -3520,6 +3545,9 @@ intel_dp_set_signal_
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:10:13AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> These are static routing, but called fairly often. (Often enough that
> you care to only read the register once.) Any reason not to preserve
> these routing tables in dev_priv or, slightly more preferrable, intel_dp?
Looking over this
On 6/23/2015 4:42 PM, David Weinehall wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 05:05:21PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:50:33PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
@@ -3520,6 +3545,9 @@ intel_dp_set_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
uint32_t *DP)
} else if (HAS_DDI(de
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:12:41PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 05:05:21PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:50:33PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
> > > @@ -3520,6 +3545,9 @@ intel_dp_set_signal_levels(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp, uint32_t *D
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 05:05:21PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:50:33PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
> > @@ -3520,6 +3545,9 @@ intel_dp_set_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > uint32_t *DP)
> > } else if (HAS_DDI(dev)) {
> > signal_levels = hsw
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 05:05:21PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:50:33PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
> > @@ -3520,6 +3545,9 @@ intel_dp_set_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > uint32_t *DP)
> > } else if (HAS_DDI(dev)) {
> > signal_levels = hsw
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:59:34AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 01:47:30PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:10:13AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:50:33PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
> > > > +static const struct ddi_
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:50:33PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
> @@ -3520,6 +3545,9 @@ intel_dp_set_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> uint32_t *DP)
> } else if (HAS_DDI(dev)) {
> signal_levels = hsw_signal_levels(train_set);
> mask = DDI_BUF_EMP_MASK;
>
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 01:47:30PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:10:13AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:50:33PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
> > > +static const struct ddi_buf_trans *skl_get_buf_trans_dp(struct
> > > drm_device *dev,
> >
>
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:10:13AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:50:33PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
> > +static const struct ddi_buf_trans *skl_get_buf_trans_dp(struct drm_device
> > *dev,
>
> struct drm_i915_private not struct drm_device!
The device uses both dev an
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:50:33PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
> +static const struct ddi_buf_trans *skl_get_buf_trans_dp(struct drm_device
> *dev,
struct drm_i915_private not struct drm_device!
> + int *n_entries)
> +{
> + struct drm_i91
This patch adds support for 0.85V VccIO on Skylake Y,
separate buffer translation tables for Skylake U,
and support for I_boost for the entries that needs this.
Issue: VIZ-5677
Signed-off-by: David Weinehall
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 8 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 12 ++
12 matches
Mail list logo
