On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:55:05PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 02:11:23PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > From: Ben Widawsky
> >
> > It's quite common for an object to simply be on the inactive list (and
> > not unbound) when we want to free the context. This of course ha
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 02:11:23PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> From: Ben Widawsky
>
> It's quite common for an object to simply be on the inactive list (and
> not unbound) when we want to free the context. This of course happens
> with lazy unbinding. Simply, this is needed when an object isn't
From: Ben Widawsky
It's quite common for an object to simply be on the inactive list (and
not unbound) when we want to free the context. This of course happens
with lazy unbinding. Simply, this is needed when an object isn't fully
unbound but we want to free one VMA of the object, for whatever re
From: Ben Widawsky
It's quite common for an object to simply be on the inactive list (and
not unbound) when we want to free the context. This of course happens
with lazy unbinding. Simply, this is needed when an object isn't fully
unbound but we want to free one VMA of the object, for whatever re
