On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 05:57:34PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On ke, 2017-03-29 at 16:56 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > The major scaling bottleneck in execbuffer is the processing of the
> > execobjects. Creating an auxiliary list is inefficient when compared to
> > using the execobject
On ke, 2017-03-29 at 16:56 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> The major scaling bottleneck in execbuffer is the processing of the
> execobjects. Creating an auxiliary list is inefficient when compared to
> using the execobject array we already have allocated.
>
> Reservation is then split into phases.
The major scaling bottleneck in execbuffer is the processing of the
execobjects. Creating an auxiliary list is inefficient when compared to
using the execobject array we already have allocated.
Reservation is then split into phases. As we lookup up the VMA, we
try and bind it back into active
