Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915: Nuke aux regs from intel_dp

2018-02-22 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Thu, 2018-02-22 at 14:43 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 07:16:07AM +, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 21:00 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > > > Just store function pointers that give us the correct register

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915: Nuke aux regs from intel_dp

2018-02-22 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 07:16:07AM +, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 21:00 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > Just store function pointers that give us the correct register offsets > > instead of storing the register offsets themselves. Slightl

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915: Nuke aux regs from intel_dp

2018-02-21 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 21:00 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Just store function pointers that give us the correct register offsets > instead of storing the register offsets themselves. Slightly less > efficient perhaps but saves a few bytes and better matches how we do > th

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915: Nuke aux regs from intel_dp

2018-02-20 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Just store function pointers that give us the correct register offsets instead of storing the register offsets themselves. Slightly less efficient perhaps but saves a few bytes and better matches how we do things elsewhere. v2: Keep a local array of data registers (Chris) Re