Op 12-4-2012 15:00, R. Reucher schreef:
>
> On Thursday 12 April 2012 14:45:18 Mark Griffith wrote:
>
> > Dear R. Reucher,
>
> Huh? I guess you're addressing the wrong person here... I didn't say
> anything about "company reports".
>
>
I did. I guess he meant me?
@Mark: it would be easier to foll
On Thursday 12 April 2012 14:45:18 Mark Griffith wrote:
> Dear R. Reucher,
Huh? I guess you're addressing the wrong person here... I didn't say anything
about "company reports".
Cheers, René
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists
hope that helps put things in perspective.
But if you have specific criticisms or ideas on how to improve it, we would
hear them.
From: Mark Griffith
To: interest@qt-project.org
Cc: Mark Griffith
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 8:45 AM
Subject: [Int
.
Dear R. Reucher,
thanks for your response about company reports - actually that's not quite
true. I'm not an economist telling you they are clear. I'm an economist telling
you we expect them to be clear, and even though most of them are unclear there
is general agreement they should and cou
