jvlad wrote:
> Meanwhile I see that php core developers and Evangelist propose the way of
> evolving difficulties.
> For example, I used split() for many many years. Now it throws a warning and
> it appears
> that this function will be removed soon. I have to rewrite all my scripts
> and replace
jvlad wrote:
>> $a = array(1);
>> $b = 0;
>> $c = &$b;
>> foreach($a as $c);
>> Now you are arguing that $b should not be 1?
>> The two pieces of code are identical
>
> It's just a nightmare example. I wonder have you ever see anything like this
> in real life?
> Could you please let me see it to
>
> No chance. No .ini settings, and I still maintain it is inconsistent.
>
> So, if I write this:
>
> $a = array(1);
> $b = 0;
> $c = &$b;
> $c = $a[0];
>
> Would you agree that $b should be 1 at this point? If so, just because
> I rewrite that code like this:
>
> $a = array(1);
> $b = 0;
> $c =
On Dec 27, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Michael Maclean wrote:
> Hi,
> Since LXR hasn't been updating since the shift to SVN, I've been
> investigating bringing it back. Today, though, I came across OpenGrok which
> appears to be a far more modern implementation of the same thing, using
> Lucene as the b
jvlad wrote:
> "Rasmus Lerdorf" wrote in message
> news:4b3785ac.2000...@lerdorf.com...
>> We can't just randomly reset variables based on their scope in this one
>> specific case. If we are going to "fix" this, it should be done by
>> introducing a way to do proper local scope variables. Reset
"Rasmus Lerdorf" wrote in message
news:4b3785ac.2000...@lerdorf.com...
> We can't just randomly reset variables based on their scope in this one
> specific case. If we are going to "fix" this, it should be done by
> introducing a way to do proper local scope variables. Resetting a
> reference s
hi,
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Michael Maclean
wrote:
> Hi,
> Since LXR hasn't been updating since the shift to SVN, I've been
> investigating bringing it back. Today, though, I came across OpenGrok which
> appears to be a far more modern implementation of the same thing, using
> Lucene as
Hi,
Since LXR hasn't been updating since the shift to SVN, I've been
investigating bringing it back. Today, though, I came across OpenGrok
which appears to be a far more modern implementation of the same thing,
using Lucene as the back end. I've set up a test installation of it at
http://php-o
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
We can't just randomly reset variables based on their scope in this one
specific case. If we are going to "fix" this, it should be done by
introducing a way to do proper local scope variables. Resetting a
reference simply because it is convenient in this one case would be
We can't just randomly reset variables based on their scope in this one
specific case. If we are going to "fix" this, it should be done by
introducing a way to do proper local scope variables. Resetting a
reference simply because it is convenient in this one case would be
completely inconsistent.
Hi!
As some already know, I'm using the holidays to prepare a proposal for
error handling in extensions
(https://saintcyr.oeri.ch/trac/php-intl/wiki/ErrorHandling).
Digging through many zend internals, I wonder if there is a possibility
to use a common ancestor class without cluttering namespaces
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Mike Wacker wrote:
> Adam Harvey wrote:
>>
>> 2009/12/27 Mike Wacker :
>>>
>>> PHP's documentation for foreach states that if you iterate by reference
>>> [foreach ($ii as &$i) ...], you should unset $i after the loop. $i still
>>> points to the last element of th
Adam Harvey wrote:
2009/12/27 Mike Wacker :
PHP's documentation for foreach states that if you iterate by reference
[foreach ($ii as &$i) ...], you should unset $i after the loop. $i still
points to the last element of the array - updating $i or reusing it will
update the last element of the ar
Chris Stockton wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
But what is every ones input on the matter of attempting to boost
PHP6's development? I'm willing to give my part in whatever I can to
help getting up on the feet to get this ball rolling.
I think that
2009/12/27 Mike Wacker :
> PHP's documentation for foreach states that if you iterate by reference
> [foreach ($ii as &$i) ...], you should unset $i after the loop. $i still
> points to the last element of the array - updating $i or reusing it will
> update the last element of the array.
>
> In sh
PHP's documentation for foreach states that if you iterate by reference
[foreach ($ii as &$i) ...], you should unset $i after the loop. $i
still points to the last element of the array - updating $i or reusing
it will update the last element of the array.
In short, why doesn't PHP automatical
16 matches
Mail list logo
