Any objections to applying the attached patch? This would suppress date
output in the generated output so that (hopefully) files generated by
re2c are not changed during the build just because of the date.
>From 21f8149129609594a01bb08c77088effbe422aa7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Be
Hi!
> Any objections to applying the attached patch? This would suppress date
> output in the generated output so that (hopefully) files generated by
> re2c are not changed during the build just because of the date.
I think it is a great idea. If we ever need a date for checked in files,
we ha
On 12/05/2012 06:06 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
>> Any objections to applying the attached patch? This would suppress date
>> output in the generated output so that (hopefully) files generated by
>> re2c are not changed during the build just because of the date.
>
> I think it is a great idea. If
Hi!
> Okay. But does the patch look okay? Is it sufficient? How can I force a
> rebuild of all files generated through re2c to remove the date from the
> files? To which branches should the patch be applied? Thanks!
I think 5.5, since we're not touching 5.4 that much anymore, especially
not in
Am 06.12.2012 08:58, schrieb Stas Malyshev:
> I think 5.5, since we're not touching 5.4 that much anymore, especially
> not in the parser department.
I committed the patch to PHP-5.5 and merged it to master from there.
--
Sebastian BergmannCo-Founder and Principal Consultant
