Hi Uze,
As the framework is single-threaded by design, many internal
modules operate on global structures. So, the global CborEncoder
objects used in oc_rep aren’t an exception, and are in fact an
efficiency that takes advantage of the single-threaded design.
Consequently, just modifying oc_rep to
r to exsiting IoTivity
API concept, I think.
We can make it enabled with patch into tiny_cbor.
BR, Uze Choi
From: Maloor, Kishen [mailto:kishen.mal...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 12:47 PM
To: 최우제 (Uze Choi); iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org
Subject: Re: [dev] API proposal for be
l 03, 2018 12:47 PM
To: 최우제 (Uze Choi);
iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org>
Subject: Re: [dev] API proposal for better userability in IoTivity Lite.
Hi Uze,
As the framework is single-threaded by design, many internal
modules operate on global structures
On segunda-feira, 2 de abril de 2018 20:47:26 PDT Maloor, Kishen wrote:
> Consequently, just modifying oc_rep to allocate them dynamically
> wouldn’t make the APIs thread-safe.
You shouldn't allocate TinyCBOR objects dynamically. The line that Uze
proposed:
CborEncoder new_rep = oc_rep_create_
y, April 2, 2018 at 10:17 PM
To: Kishen Maloor mailto:kishen.mal...@intel.com>>,
"iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org>"
mailto:iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org>>
Subject: RE: [dev] API proposal for better userability in IoTivity Lite.
d build up. Send response to be done.
For this scenario, separation of do_post_init and representation build need to
be separated.
representation build need to be done separate thread.
BR, Uze Choi
From: Maloor, Kishen [mailto:kishen.mal...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2018 8:16 AM
To: 최우
presentation build need to
be separated.
representation build need to be done separate thread.
BR, Uze Choi
From: Maloor, Kishen [mailto:kishen.mal...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2018 8:16 AM
To: 최우제 (Uze Choi);
iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org>
ice Lab(SR)/삼성전자
Date : 2018-04-04 17:16 (GMT+9)
Title : Re: [dev] API proposal for better userability in IoTivity Lite.
Hi Kishen, Thank you feedback.
Let me clarify fundamental concern.
I intend to “Remove the synchronization effort from the developer.”
Samsung have developed sever
...@lynxtechnology.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2018 5:22 PM
To: 최우제 (Uze Choi); Maloor, Kishen; iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org
Subject: Re: [dev] API proposal for better userability in IoTivity Lite.
Hi,
in my view a thread safe API is not needed by all developers.
Therefore it should not be part
r/Best Reviewer/Data Service
Lab(SR)/삼성전자
Date : 2018-04-04 17:16 (GMT+9)
Title : Re: [dev] API proposal for better userability in IoTivity Lite.
Hi Kishen, Thank you feedback.
Let me clarify fundamental concern.
I intend to “Remove the synchronization effort from the developer.”
Samsung ha
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018, 1:47 AM Christian Gran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in my opinion we should only add APIs if really really needed for
> functionality.
> IOTivity Light is about beeing small - if the functionality is available
> or can be solved by the application already, no additional APIs are needed.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018, 3:53 AM 최우제 (Uze Choi) wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> Even though this is not needed by all developer, this is also required.
>
Required by whom?
> To satisfy this requirement, minimal code needs to be added.
>
> I don’t think it take lots of code.
>
It would set a bad precedent
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018, 1:19 PM Gregg Reynolds wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018, 3:53 AM 최우제 (Uze Choi) wrote:
>
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> Even though this is not needed by all developer, this is also required.
>>
> Required by whom?
>
>> To satisfy this requirement, minimal code needs to be added.
>>
Hi,
do we have a process in place where we agree on ‘requirements’ ?
Why is multi threading a requirement - where does this come from?
So far only reuqirements I have seen in Prag is OCF compliance and as small as
possible, so that the stack fits in as many devices as possible.
These are strong
) ;
Maloor, Kishen ; iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org
Subject: Re: [dev] API proposal for better userability in IoTivity Lite.
Hi,
do we have a process in place where we agree on ‘requirements’ ?
Why is multi threading a requirement - where does this come from?
So far only reuqirements I have seen in Prag
To respond to this question: there is a documented process, which is here:
https://wiki.iotivity.org/iotivity_features_branches_and_release_process
now whether that process is actually followed in general is another
question, but bringing the question here was supposed to be the first step,
and t
Hi,
thanks for the links - that is helpful.
Disucssing a ‘feature’ on the mailing list is a good first step.
What we do not have in place is a mechanism to accpet or reject a feature
request - or did I miss that part?
Thoughts?
thanks
Christian
On 5. Apr 2018, at 17:01, Mats Wichmann
ma
: Wouter van der Beek (wovander) [mailto:wovan...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 6:53 PM
To: Christian Gran; Gregg Reynolds; 최우제(Uze Choi); Maloor, Kishen;
iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org
Subject: RE: [dev] API proposal for better userability in IoTivity Lite.
Just a thought.
We can
...@lists.iotivity.org] On Behalf Of Christian Gran
Sent: 06 April 2018 07:50
To: Mats Wichmann ; iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org
Subject: Re: [dev] API proposal for better userability in IoTivity Lite.
Hi,
thanks for the links - that is helpful.
Disucssing a ‘feature’ on the mailing list is a good first
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018, 3:01 AM 최우제 (Uze Choi) wrote:
> Sorry for late response due to mail system filtering. I didn’t ware of it.
>
>
>
> I think open source project need to have two most important quality
> factors which are extensibility for more usage and maintainability.
>
> Of course some proj
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018, 2:36 PM Gregg Reynolds wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018, 3:01 AM 최우제 (Uze Choi) wrote:
>
>> Sorry for late response due to mail system filtering. I didn’t ware of it.
>>
>>
>>
>> I think open source project need to have two most important quality
>> factors which are extensi
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018, 3:01 AM 최우제 (Uze Choi) wrote:
> Sorry for late response due to mail system filtering. I didn’t ware of it.
>
>
>
> I think open source project need to have two most important quality
> factors which are extensibility for more usage and maintainability.
>
> Of course some proj
Hi Gregg,
This is good strategy to make it work on a separate build system excluding it.
BR, Uze Choi
From: Gregg Reynolds [mailto:d...@mobileink.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2018 4:34 AM
To: 최우제(Uze Choi)
Cc: iotivity-dev
Subject: Re: [dev] API proposal for better userability in IoTivity Lite
23 matches
Mail list logo
