Paul Elschot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 30/05/2007 23:57:47:
> On Thursday 31 May 2007 05:52, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> >
> > On May 30, 2007, at 9:33 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> > >> I'd rather see each jar get its own javadoc,
> > >> or at the very least, indicate which jar each
> > >> class is d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-887:
-
Attachment: ExtendedIndexWriter.java
Here is the code I originally wrote to add a shutdown functi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch resolved LUCENE-866.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed.
> Multi-level skipping on posting lists
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Mallwitz updated LUCENE-763:
--
Attachment: (was: LuceneDictionary.java)
> LuceneDictionary skips first word in enu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Mallwitz updated LUCENE-763:
--
Attachment: (was: TestLuceneDictionary.java)
> LuceneDictionary skips first word in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Mallwitz updated LUCENE-763:
--
Attachment: TestLuceneDictionary.java
New extended unit test case for class LuceneDicti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Mallwitz updated LUCENE-763:
--
Attachment: LuceneDictionary.java
Fixed class LuceneDictionary
> LuceneDictionary skip
I knew the boolean flag which was in the class in the first place was
used for something ... :-)
Anyway, I have uploaded updated class and unit test files.
Thanks
Christian
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project lucene-java has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project lucene-java has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
On May 31, 2007, at 3:48 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ 7. LUCENE-866: Adds multi-level skip lists to the posting lists.
This speeds
+up most queries that use skipTo(), especially on big indexes
with large posting
+lists. For average AND queries the speedup is about 20%, for
queries
Change how Core and Contrib javadocs are hosted
---
Key: LUCENE-897
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-897
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Websit
Steven Parkes wrote:
Is there any particular reason that the version that takes a Directory[]
optimizes first?
There was, but unfortunately I can't recall it now. Index merging has
changed substantially since then, so, whatever it was, it may no longer
apply. If no one can think of a good r
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Doug Cutting wrote:
Steven Parkes wrote:
Is there any particular reason that the version that takes a Directory[]
optimizes first?
There was, but unfortunately I can't recall it now. Index merging has
changed substantially since then, so, whatever it was, it may no lon
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
I'd rather see each jar get its own javadoc,
or at the very least, indicate which jar each
class is defined in for the ones that aren't
part of the core.
Yeah, I don't like that all the contribs are built in together. What do
others think? I would vote for separating
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12500427
]
Doug Cutting commented on LUCENE-698:
-
> If boost is zero, then
> sumOfSquaredWeights() returns zero as well, res
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man reopened LUCENE-885:
-
Officially reopening this bug as i have discovered that it causes the build to
fail on java 1.4
the problem
contrib/javascript is not packaged into releases
Key: LUCENE-898
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-898
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12500437
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-698:
-
> the default implementation of queryNorm to return 1.0 instead of Infinit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12500453
]
Erik Hatcher commented on LUCENE-898:
-
My vote is to remove the javascript contrib area entirely. It doesn't rea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Naber closed LUCENE-763.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.2
Thanks, patch applied.
> LuceneDictionary skips first w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12500457
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-887:
---
This looks great to me!
I think we should keep it out of cor
several gdata build targets don't work from contrib/gdata
-
Key: LUCENE-899
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-899
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Repo
I like the suggestion of having two views: a unified view and then
also a separate view. Slightly more work to setup, but should
satisfy both camps.
On May 31, 2007, at 1:16 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
I like the single javadoc build. The linking is nice, e.g., all
Analyzer implementations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12500477
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-897:
See http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/49348 for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved LUCENE-885.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 543257.
Compilation and test of the entire tree should work fine no
Hmmm ... something's not meshing for me here.
If I understood what you've said, you have a DbD index to which you are
addIndexes'ing a memory index? I must have missed something, because
addIndexes pre- and post-optimizes the target (Dbd) index, not the
operand (mem) index.
-Original Message-
While testing LUCENE-866 I realized that Java assertions
are disabled when *I* run 'ant test'.
Others did have the assertion executed and causing that
NPE. So I am not sure if this is general problem or only
a Windows one.
Compile wise we are ok, having "-source 1.4".
At runtime, assertions can
"Doron Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> While testing LUCENE-866 I realized that Java assertions
> are disabled when *I* run 'ant test'.
I noticed this too; in my patch on LUCENE-843 I've turned
on assertions for all unit tests (I'm using alot of asserts
in that patch) as well.
> Others did
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12500521
]
Steven Parkes commented on LUCENE-763:
--
Can we also update the javadocs to reflect the different semantics betwe
On Friday 01 June 2007 00:30, Doron Cohen wrote:
>
> While testing LUCENE-866 I realized that Java assertions
> are disabled when *I* run 'ant test'.
> Others did have the assertion executed and causing that
> NPE. So I am not sure if this is general problem or only
> a Windows one.
Indeed, see b
I think that having assertions is of no value if they are never
turned on :)
I suggest going carefully in adding assertions. There are a lot of
places where assertions are inappropriate (e.g. checking parameters
on a public method).
I think Sun's document gives good guidelines:
http://ja
DM Smith wrote on 31/05/2007 15:59:05:
> I think that having assertions is of no value if they are never
> turned on :)
>
> I suggest going carefully in adding assertions. There are a lot of
> places where assertions are inappropriate (e.g. checking parameters
> on a public method).
>
> I think Su
Enable Java asserts in the Junit tests
--
Key: LUCENE-900
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-900
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Test
Components: Build
Reporter: Dor
Paul Elschot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 31/05/2007 16:21:09:
> > Adding:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > to the task would enable assertions during tests
> > regardless of ANT_OPTS variable (and hopefully on all OSs).
> My common-build.xml has this added in the junit task:
>
>
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Steven Parkes wrote:
Hmmm ... something's not meshing for me here.
If I understood what you've said, you have a DbD index to which you are
addIndexes'ing a memory index? I must have missed something, because
addIndexes pre- and post-optimizes the target (Dbd) index, not th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12500550
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-887:
--
> This looks great to me!
Thanks for reviewing!
> So, if a shutdown re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12500552
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-698:
--
> So perhaps we can remove the NaN by modifying the default implementati
DefaultSimilarity.queryNorm() should never return Infinity
--
Key: LUCENE-901
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-901
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Comp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12500569
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-898:
--
> My vote is to remove the javascript contrib area entirely.
+1. It al
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12500576
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-901:
-
I'm not sure if i agree with this concept. Do we really want the curve of
values
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12500575
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-898:
-
I think the files have not changed in a while because they work.
42 matches
Mail list logo
