A mail with an executable attachment was detected and Blocked.
Kindly contact the receipent before sending.
Regards
MailAdmin
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
S
Banned CD Government don't want me to sell it. See Now &
sandy buena angling addition thither intimate pledge survival elsie gamecock discus amethystine weatherstripping cheap junketeer adventure must worthwhile copybook anneal choreography recessive kleenex larkin deoxyribose cochineal lip coa
Sorry, but ListManager did not find your email address
-> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
listed as a member of wedi-routing.
Only members of wedi-routing are allowed to contribute messages.
Because ListManager could not confirm that you are a member of wedi-routing,
your message was not accepted.
---
Ret
The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as a
binary attachment.
body.zip
Description: Binary data
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
The message contains Unicode characters and has been sent as a binary attachment.
document.zip
Description: Binary data
The original message was received at Mon, 26 Jan 2004 19:41:36 -0500 (EST)
from [63.96.171.218]
*** ATTENTION ***
Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with its
delivery. The address which was undeliverable is listed in the section
labeled: "- The following addre
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange took action on the message. The message details were:
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject = [JBoss-dev] Hello
Scanning time = 01/27/2004 00:59:21
Engine/Pattern = 6.810-1005/743
Action taken on message:
The attachment test.zip cont
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange took action on the message. The message details were:
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject = [JBoss-dev] Lrkle
Scanning time = 01/27/2004 00:59:17
Engine/Pattern = 6.810-1005/743
Action taken on message:
The attachment document.zip
Mail transaction failed. Partial message is available.
body.zip
Description: Binary data
Bugs item #870942, was opened at 2004-01-05 06:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=870942&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
>Resolution: Accepted
Priority:
document.zip
Description: Binary data
Bugs item #885095, was opened at 2004-01-26 13:09
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=885095&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Non
The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as a
binary attachment.
test.zip
Description: Binary data
The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as a
binary attachment.
document.zip
Description: Binary data
Bugs item #885053, was opened at 2004-01-26 22:07
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=885053&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Non
Hi,
I recall a thread "xmbean peristence broken" or such.
Is there a solution on this?
Heiko
--
Heiko W. Rupp EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Consultant Telefon: +49 711 222 992 - 900
Cellent AG Finance SolutionsTelefax: +49 711 222 992 - 999
Calwer Str.
Hi,
I have the impression that the attributes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
should be move to the persistence-manager element of the
xmbean descriptor, as they are specific per pm.
Does it make sense to address this now (*) or is the
xmbean-dd rewritten anyway? So this would be the fir
Our US Licensed Doctors will
Prescribes Your Medication For Free
Medications Shipped Overnight To Your Do.
show
Me more
miscellaneous beneficent harrington dressmake bentley protozoan scandal dichotomy aiken transpiration detonate farewell freestone candela councilwoman audience attai
Jung , Dr. Christoph wrote:
Marek,
How does the wsdl look like under 3.0.6 or 3.2.1?
There is indeed some jboss.net specific code that builds service meta-data
from the JMX introspection API, but this code should just drive the Axis
WSDL-Emitter (which then generates the seemingly invalid xsd f
Feature Requests item #884845, was opened at 2004-01-26 16:14
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376688&aid=884845&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Res
Bugs item #883446, was opened at 2004-01-23 21:41
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=883446&group_id=22866
Category: Nukes
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Marek,
How does the wsdl look like under 3.0.6 or 3.2.1?
There is indeed some jboss.net specific code that builds service meta-data
from the JMX introspection API, but this code should just drive the Axis
WSDL-Emitter (which then generates the seemingly invalid xsd fragment).
CGJ
-Ursp
24 matches
Mail list logo