PROTECTED]; The Core
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: Service Lifecyle confusions -
> potential fix
>
>
> I often see people puzzled by the fact that the depend tag
> does not include
> registration. When there are two SARs, the second of which
> has MBeans that
> de
I added your comment to the forums.
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3824602#3824602
It seems jboss-dev does not accept posts with jboss-dev in copy?
Regards,
Adrian
On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 15:53, Bill Burke wrote:
> I was also hoping that you could supply a mixin class tha
On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 02:20, Adrian Brock wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 02:08, Scott M Stark wrote:
> > The state machine was not immeadiately for the service layer, but
> > will be used to enforce illegal transitions if we decide on a state
> > diagram.
> >
> > The suggested change makes sense,
On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 02:08, Scott M Stark wrote:
> The state machine was not immeadiately for the service layer, but
> will be used to enforce illegal transitions if we decide on a state
> diagram.
>
> The suggested change makes sense, but the other problem is the fact
> that the deployment layer
The state machine was not immeadiately for the service layer, but
will be used to enforce illegal transitions if we decide on a state
diagram.
The suggested change makes sense, but the other problem is the fact
that the deployment layer is out of the loop in this. I would like
to couple dependency
