[JBoss-user] [JBossCache] - Re: aop-enabled objects not Serializable anymore?

2006-02-09 Thread anupama
Hi Ben, I have the following POJO class which needs to be apectized and has to send over wire to client. Code: | import java.io.Serializable; | import java.util.ArrayList; | | /** | * | * @@org.jboss.cache.aop.AopMarker | */ | | public class Answer implements

[JBoss-user] [JBossCache] - Re: aop-enabled objects not Serializable anymore?

2005-10-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It should. Let's say a Person object has reference to List. Then when you store the Person object in the CacheAop, we will swap out the List reference with a proxy dynamically. -Ben View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3903555#3903555 Reply to the

[JBoss-user] [JBossCache] - Re: aop-enabled objects not Serializable anymore?

2005-10-25 Thread Motormind
Well, I solved it by wrapping the result from the cache in an object that it still serializable. The next problem is: are Collections in stored objects also automatically stored when I use TreeCacheAop? I don't see that happening... when I ask the contents of a Collection with a cached object

[JBoss-user] [JBossCache] - Re: aop-enabled objects not Serializable anymore?

2005-10-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, this is the AOP-associated interceptor that we attach. Problem is this is not Serializable. And it doesn't make sense for it to be Serializable, IMO. Can you give me your use case? One way to do it is do removeObject first, then the pojo will become regular pojo. But that will destroy the