[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : jsr160 is not required by j2ee 1.4 and so it has not been
implemented yet. The referenced page: http://mc4j.sourceforge.net/usageJBoss.html says
it works with 3.2 and if it does, the same url would be used. This page incorrectly
states that the RMIAdaptor location is
That should not matter if both use the JMX Remote Interface -- JSR160.
This is the defined standard and Jboss ought to support that. Does it not?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3844063#3844063
Reply to the post :
jsr160 is not required by j2ee 1.4 and so it has not been implemented yet. The
referenced page: http://mc4j.sourceforge.net/usageJBoss.html says it works with 3.2
and if it does, the same url would be used. This page incorrectly states that the
RMIAdaptor location is not jmx/rmi/RMIAdaptor.
Thanks for the clarification. From some other forum entries I got the impression that
this would be included in 4.0
Any Idea when or if this will be implemented?
Mike
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3844107#3844107
Reply to the post :
If = yes, when = after 4.0.0.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3844109#3844109
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3844109
---
This SF.Net email
MC4J Management Console does not support remoting for jboss.
see the requirements section in http://mc4j.sourceforge.net/usageJBoss.html
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3844028#3844028
Reply to the post :
