On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Simon Legner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 30/01/12 15:07, Josh Doe wrote:
>> I would suggest that we create a single set of changes between each
>> tested release, separating the changes by major/minor enhancements,
>> and major bugs (leaving minor bugs to be found via ticke
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012, Simon Legner wrote:
Do you think we can merge both lists, at least internally? We'd have one
wiki page ChangelogSource and each entry is marked either for changelog
or for startup note or for both. This would remove redundancy and make
live easier for the translators.
Remo
Hi!
On 09/02/12 16:58, Paul Hartmann wrote:
> Do you think we can merge both lists, at least internally? We'd have one
> wiki page ChangelogSource and each entry is marked either for changelog
> or for startup note or for both. This would remove redundancy and make
> live easier for the translator
On 02/07/2012 02:23 PM, Simon Legner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 30/01/12 15:07, Josh Doe wrote:
>> I would suggest that we create a single set of changes between each
>> tested release, separating the changes by major/minor enhancements,
>> and major bugs (leaving minor bugs to be found via tickets). I b
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Josh Doe wrote:
I think it would be useful to create a more user-friendly changelog
for the -tested releases, something which lies between the contents of
the StartupPage and the SVN log. As we seem to be focused on creating
a better experience for new users (e.g. creating e
I think it would be useful to create a more user-friendly changelog
for the -tested releases, something which lies between the contents of
the StartupPage and the SVN log. As we seem to be focused on creating
a better experience for new users (e.g. creating expert mode), I think
we need to take the