Re: [josm-dev] Why 5174 ?

2012-04-13 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, colliar wrote: Please update tested to at least r5178 (i18 - update) No use in doing so, as except for "hu" language the update does not really improve situation, as all new strings are missing. Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available)

Re: [josm-dev] Why 5174 ?

2012-04-12 Thread colliar
On 12/04/12 14:23, Simon Legner wrote: Hey Please update tested to at least r5178 (i18 - update) Thanks signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo

Re: [josm-dev] Why 5174 ?

2012-04-12 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Simon Legner wrote: You use values_context in when given for the combo. The perl should reflect this, otherwise translations can't be used in this combination. I thought, I do so. See line 139 in convpreset: my $vctxi = ($line =~ /value_context=(".*?")/) ? $1 : $vctx

Re: [josm-dev] Why 5174 ?

2012-04-12 Thread Simon Legner
Hi! On 12/04/12 14:13, Dirk Stöcker wrote: > Maybe you must be member of https://launchpad.net/~openstreetmap ? > > But theoretically it should not be necessary... I joined the team, now awaiting approval … Dirk, would you upload the updated .pot? __

Re: [josm-dev] Why 5174 ?

2012-04-12 Thread Simon Legner
Hi! On 12/04/12 14:14, Dirk Stöcker wrote: > You use values_context in when given for the combo. The > perl should reflect this, otherwise translations can't be used in this > combination. I thought, I do so. See line 139 in convpreset: > my $vctxi = ($line =~ /value_context=(".*?")/) ? $1 :

Re: [josm-dev] Why 5174 ?

2012-04-12 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Simon Legner wrote: Also, before we can upload translation templates to launchpad again, this file [1] needs to be adapted to Simon's preset enhancements. I'm looking at it – to be finished soon. Done – o28250. You use values_context in when given for the combo. The p

Re: [josm-dev] Why 5174 ?

2012-04-12 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Simon Legner wrote: Also you need a lot of perl modules to get this working (WWW::Mechanize and others). I did all this. When I open https://translations.launchpad.net/josm/trunk/+translations-upload in the browser, I get: Not allowed here Sorry, you don't have permissio

Re: [josm-dev] Why 5174 ?

2012-04-12 Thread Simon Legner
Hi! On 12/04/12 14:02, Dirk Stöcker wrote: > On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Simon Legner wrote: > >> … but then I got: >>> Error GETing >>> https://translations.launchpad.net/josm/trunk/+translations-upload: >>> Forbidden at ./launchpad.pl line 169 >> >> Apparently, I have no permissions to update the POT

Re: [josm-dev] Why 5174 ?

2012-04-12 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Simon Legner wrote: … but then I got: Error GETing https://translations.launchpad.net/josm/trunk/+translations-upload: Forbidden at ./launchpad.pl line 169 Apparently, I have no permissions to update the POT files. You must be able to login! Create a file "launchpad.

Re: [josm-dev] Why 5174 ?

2012-04-12 Thread Simon Legner
Hi! >> Shouldn't we update translations by the way ? They haven't be updated since >> 5047. > Yes, we should. Done in r5178, r5179. > upload translation templates to launchpad again > You are welcome to help, and do i18n updates as you see fit or take > over i18n maintenance completely. I tr

Re: [josm-dev] Why 5174 ?

2012-04-12 Thread Simon Legner
>> Also, before we can upload >> translation templates to launchpad again, this file [1] needs to be >> adapted to Simon's preset enhancements. > > I'm looking at it – to be finished soon. Done – o28250. ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap

Re: [josm-dev] Why 5174 ?

2012-04-12 Thread Simon Legner
Hi! On 12/04/12 11:00, Paul Hartmann wrote: > Also, before we can upload > translation templates to launchpad again, this file [1] needs to be > adapted to Simon's preset enhancements. I'm looking at it – to be finished soon. Cheers, Simon ___ josm-de

Re: [josm-dev] Why 5174 ?

2012-04-12 Thread Paul Hartmann
2012/4/12, Vincent Privat : > Hi, > > I'm a bit surprised in the choice of publishing 5174 as the tested version. > Is there something wrong with 5177 ? As far as I see it does only contain > bugfixes. OK, updated to 5177. > Shouldn't we update translations by the way ? They haven't be updated si

Re: [josm-dev] Why 5174 ?

2012-04-12 Thread Simon Legner
Hi! > Is there something wrong with 5177 ? Thanks for updating to 5177, Paul … > Shouldn't we update translations by the way ? They haven't be updated since > 5047. I agree, but I don't know how this is done. :-) Maybe we should also consider this ticket: http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/748

[josm-dev] Why 5174 ?

2012-04-12 Thread Vincent Privat
Hi, I'm a bit surprised in the choice of publishing 5174 as the tested version. Is there something wrong with 5177 ? As far as I see it does only contain bugfixes. Shouldn't we update translations by the way ? They haven't be updated since 5047. Vincent __