Hrm...not a bad idea. I'll look into that.
_
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kristinn Sigmundsson
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 4:24 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Stop pending AJAX processes?
hmm how about then mak
Sent:* Friday, April 06, 2007 9:41 AM
*To:* jquery-en@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* [jQuery] Re: Stop pending AJAX processes?
Andy,
If you want all the information to just be there, then include it in the
original HTML and just hide it. The core benefit you gain by loading content
"on demand&q
ent and it didn't
seem to work. I'll go back and try it again.
andy
_
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kristinn Sigmundsson
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 9:51 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Stop pending AJAX proce
ike. So I think this is a good
middle ground. It's more proof of concept anyway but I'm interested to see
how it might work.
_
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dan G. Switzer, II
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 9:41 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegr
I think I've seen something like this for stopping ajax calls:
var ajaxcall = $.ajax()
ajaxcall.abort();
As I said, I _think_ I've seen it, could be worth testing if it works.
As for calling all the ajax calls, maybe a .each() might do the work?
and btw, I noticed that you are making the ca
Andy,
If you want all the information to just be there, then include it in the
original HTML and just hide it. The core benefit you gain by loading content
"on demand" is you only send the data that's necessary. If you ended up
doing a bunch of AJAX calls to load all the data, all you've done i
6 matches
Mail list logo
