while we figure the rest of this out.
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 6:59 AM Christopher Glass wrote:
>>
>> Small comment while mentioning charm-helpers:
>>
>> What I would really like to see is the project's tests running in CI,
>> before things start moving a
Small comment while mentioning charm-helpers:
What I would really like to see is the project's tests running in CI,
before things start moving around. The last few times we ran them we
discovered many were broken (I suspect people need to put out fires
and don't bother running the tests before com
Y's unit name should be accessible through "$JUJU_REMOTE_UNIT" from
X's relation-joined hook.
See http://juju-docs.readthedocs.org/en/latest/internals/unit-agent-hooks.html
Hope this helps!
- Chris
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> Hi,
>
> let's say I have two services,
Hi Vasiliy,
I'm not entirely familiar with the KVM aspect of this, but I'm used to
deploying stuff on LXC with the local provider. Maybe somebody with
more KVM+juju experience can chime in.
Try deploying your first charm normally (without --to). That should
create a "machine1" VM, then you can de
Heya,
Thanks a lot for your feedback (and David's as well, of course).
It's hard to get these big refactorings right without having more eyes
on the code, so thanks a lot for helping with fleshing it out :)
I think the way forward for this branch is: renaming the
"storage-providers.d" folder to
.
>
> Marco
>
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Christopher Glass
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've started playing with and deploying my "ubuntu-mirror" charm, that
>> leverages the excellent "storage" subordinate charm to create full
&
Hi all,
I've started playing with and deploying my "ubuntu-mirror" charm, that
leverages the excellent "storage" subordinate charm to create full
ubuntu mirrors.
That allows you to mirror a lot of the bits that make up ubuntu: the
apt repositories of course, but also cdimages, releases, ports and
Maybe we should ask github to ping him.
I did the same for an similar situation and their reaction was: they
sent him a couple of emails about it, and gave me the name after they
didn't get a response for X days. I guess mentioning that it also
happens to be our trademark might help, too.
Since h
For the record, we can easily send branches against charms that matter
to us for this particular case (as we will for few other
landscape-owned branches waiting for review [1] [2] [3], hint hint :)
).
But this seems like a problem in need of a more general (and scalable) solution.
- Chris (tribaa
