Hmm. Normally for LB we expect to see a ulst next hop, which in turn contains
two or more ucst NHs. The FT display indicates that a single NH is installed
for that prefix.
Can you describe the nature of the test traffic? If its all one flow I'd expect
all to take the same NH even when LB is in
I tried to hard code the peer MAC for probes and it hasnt taken
exec nsrp probe interface [ mac_addr ]
I still see the default NSRP MAC for the destination
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Ivan c <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doesn't seem to be the case though, even though logic would dictate
> th
I tried this on MX960 and it seams that load balancing is on by default. How
do I turn load balancing off?
In the RT I can see both next hops:
2.2.2.2/32 *[OSPF/10] 02:21:29, metric 1
to 10.0.2.2 via ge-8/0/5.0
> to 10.0.3.2 via ge-5/1/0.0
In the
I know you only asked about the J and MX series. The ERX platform will
terminate a tunnel in the VRF.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Benny Amorsen
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 4:08 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] IPSEC i
My experience is that JUNOScript would try to initiate the connection
to a weird port - I cannot remember which port that it, but you can
find out easily by doing a tcpdump.
Basically what I did was locating that port number in the source code
and changing it to 22.
Hope this helps.
-Simon
On T
ignore .
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
All,
I'm playing with JUNOScript and after installation I get the following
error:
[get_chassis_inventory]# perl get_chassis_inventory.pl x.x.x.x -m ssh
login: *
password:
ERROR[1]: recv failed: EOF
ERROR[2]: initial handshake with JUNOScript server failed
Has anyone seen this or know th
Fair enough. I simply read the scenario involving two routers sharing a
frame-relay p2p link. :)
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Jesper Skriver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 9:27 AM
To: Scott Morris
Cc: 'Farhan Jaffer'; 'Juniper Puck'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subje
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 07:49:09AM -0400, Scott Morris wrote:
> There is no ARP in frame-relay. More specifically, on a P2P subinterface,
> there's no mapping either.
I think you're mis understanding my suggestion, I was suggesting
that router A could only reach router B because the router in th
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:59:44AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - *May* use an explicit tunnel PIC in one of the 4 PIC slots (but since
> there is always a built-in tunnel PIC, why would you want to?).
If I remember correctly, the onboard "Tunnel PIC" gives you only
~150mbps throughput. I may
Thanks for all.
It was one mistake from my side. I used management interface ip
address for routes on Juniper :)
It's working fine now.
Thanks again.
-FJ
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Farhan Jaffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is an interesting situation, let me discuss the s
There is no ARP in frame-relay. More specifically, on a P2P subinterface,
there's no mapping either. The assumption is that if it's not MY address it
must be yours. So as long as you believe the other side is within the
defined subnet, then you're good.
If you have 10.1.1.1/24 on one side, and
The PVC being "up" is a signaling of LMI telling you that it's in an ACTIVE
state.
It's more like you can call me on the telephone. But if you speak japanese
and I do not, we really can't have much of a conversation yet the "link" is
still up!
HTH,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Ma
The specific algorithm differs on different chipsets, and is
generally considered to be a "trade secret" of Juniper. This
decision was made several years ago when I suggested filing a
patent application for one of the chipset's algorithm.
Paul Goyette
Juniper Networks Customer Service
JTAC Senior
Let me guess, on Cisco Router A you got an ARP entry for Cisco
Router B's address when you put a Cisco router in the middle, as
the Cisco router has proxy-arp enabled by default.
Or to put it more clearly the IP addresses used FR p2p pvc is a
subset of the IP addresses used on the link between Cis
On your Cisco router, when you look at "show frame map" what do you see as
the encapsulation? Is it CISCO or IETF?
Juniper routers (like most other vendors) does not do CISCO frame
encapsulation, so if you change to IETF on the Cisco side you should be
fine.
Note, this is different than Cisco LM
Hi,
There is an interesting situation, let me discuss the scenario first,
Cisco Router A (same n/w) Juniper Router -(FR
point-to-point pvc) --- Cisco Router B.
PVC is Active & point to point connectivity is OK. But the ping
response from cisco router A to B via FR is unreachable
I don't understand how to assign remote settings shrewsoft only has xauth
not auth as an option.i have tried it from trust to untrust with
authentication applied on the policy for a specific user
And when he requested internet service he got a prompt to enter username and
password I entered the us
In the Juniper documentation I can read:
"By default, or if you specify only the layer-3 statement, the router uses the
incoming
interface index as well as the following Layer 3 information in the packet
header to
load balance traffic:
- Source IP address
- Destination IP address
- Protocol"
A
> The hash algorithm uses the source IP address, the destination IP address,
> the Protocol field and the Incoming Interface Index in order to generate a
> key.
Thanks David. How is chosen the next-hop with this generate key? I am looking
for this algorithm.
Regards,
Samuel
-Message d
Hi,
The hash algorithm uses the source IP address, the destination IP address, the
Protocol field and the Incoming Interface Index in order to generate a key.
Regards
David
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : j
Hi Group,
Do you know how work hash algorithm used in load balancing (only
layer-3)? Is there some documentation about it?
Thanks,
Samuel
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
22 matches
Mail list logo
