On 4/Jun/15 15:51, Raphael Mazelier wrote:
>
>
> EX4550 in the other hand are not perfect, but stable and less expensive.
> For aggregation swithes with only 10G ports I will go with EX4550.
We love them.
We aggregate customers on them (Layer 2 only), and can simply switch
from 1Gbps to 10Gbps
On 4/Jun/15 15:49, Giuliano (WZTECH) wrote:
> I think the better option is to use ACX5048
>
> Same qfx hardware with a different software
>
> It will support vpls and evpn
>
> But I think you will need license for 10G interfaces and L3vpn
Broadcom chipset, however. So look out and test for any
On 2 June 2015 at 21:15, Chris Adams wrote:
> I have used policers on units to limit the traffic for a particular
> VLAN, but now I have a need to limit the total traffic on an interface.
> I have a gigE link that is telco-limited to 500Mbps (but I need to
> police the link so I don't put more th
+1 for the EX 4600 or QFX 5100. For aggregation a 4600 should do the trick.
On Jun 4, 2015, at 9:19 AM, Colton Conor wrote:
> We need a Juniper switch with at least 24 built in SFP+ ports. Looks like
> Juniper has a ton of options including the EX4500, EX4550, EX4600, and the
> QFX line which I
Le 04/06/15 15:19, Colton Conor a écrit :
We need a Juniper switch with at least 24 built in SFP+ ports. Looks like
Juniper has a ton of options including the EX4500, EX4550, EX4600, and the
QFX line which I don't know much about. This switch will be for aggregation
purposes for an access netwo
I think the better option is to use ACX5048
Same qfx hardware with a different software
It will support vpls and evpn
But I think you will need license for 10G interfaces and L3vpn
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 4, 2015, at 10:38, Tim Jackson wrote:
>
> It should support EVPN shortly.
>
>>
It should support EVPN shortly.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015, 6:38 AM Joe Freeman wrote:
> Keep in mind the QFX5100 doesn't support evpn or vpls. To do vpls right
> now, we're having to l2vpn back to an MX tunnel interface and stitch into a
> bridge domain. It's not pretty but so far it has worked. We've
Keep in mind the QFX5100 doesn't support evpn or vpls. To do vpls right
now, we're having to l2vpn back to an MX tunnel interface and stitch into a
bridge domain. It's not pretty but so far it has worked. We've got our
fingers crossed that evpn is coming soon.
Also, the 5100's apparently aren't us
I'd recommend QFX5100 or EX4600. Same hardware inside for both.
Beware that there are a few issues with DHCP and DHCPv6 pass through on
them, but that seems to be resolved now.
On Jun 4, 2015 6:22 AM, "Colton Conor" wrote:
> We need a Juniper switch with at least 24 built in SFP+ ports. Looks li
Once upon a time, Arie Vayner said:
> You should actually shape to 500Mbps and not police your traffic...
Shaping adds jitter (feeds the bufferbloat problem).
> I think this could be a good start:
> http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junose15.1/information-products/topic-collections/qos-confi
We need a Juniper switch with at least 24 built in SFP+ ports. Looks like
Juniper has a ton of options including the EX4500, EX4550, EX4600, and the
QFX line which I don't know much about. This switch will be for aggregation
purposes for an access network that has GPON OLT's with 10G uplinks on
the
Hi,
Here is what i know, and what i've been able to find:
I don't think there is automatic grouping of neighbor in junos, you have
to make the groups by yourself, example:
> show configuration protocols bgp
group external-peers {
type external;
export bgp_public_out;
peer-as ...;
12 matches
Mail list logo
