Its not a bigger 104. Its a new router completely.
Good
* Junipers fastest router yet (yes)
* Good price
* Full MX featureset
* Small footprint
* EX and QFX can be run as fusiondevices to get more ports
Bad
* Portconfig is weird. Sacrifice 100G to use SFP+. What is 3x100G + 8x10G
actually usefu
On 27/09/16 16:47, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> What is the current stand in this matter?
> Are 3rd party juniper compatible CFPs a viable alternative?
> As it looks like no one is making CFP-SR10s, -are these dead/legacy?
> -cause it doesn’t seem to be such a problem to find 3rd party 10
From: Mark Tinka
To: quinn snyder , Saku Ytti
Cc: Juniper List
Sent: 5/21/2016 11:02 PM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] RE-S-X6-64G-BB
On 21/May/16 22:51, quinn snyder wrote:
> isnt the point of hypervisor on re/rp meant to support $os within vm?
> i know cisco is moving toward
On 11/04/16 08:55, Alireza Soltanian wrote:
> No T640 and T4000 are still manufactured. Anyway is there anybody who can
> provide answer?
>
> On Apr 11, 2016 11:24 AM, "Fredrik Korsbäck" <mailto:hu...@nordu.net>> wrote:
>
> You do realize that mo
You do realize that most of T-series is EOL?
Hugge@ as2603
> 11 Apr 2016 kl. 07:02 skrev Alireza Soltanian :
>
> Hi
>
> Yes the price of MX Series is much higher.
>
>
>
> From: Josh Reynolds [mailto:j...@kyneticwifi.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 9:27 AM
> To: Alireza Soltanian
> Cc:
5 matches
Mail list logo