Hi, I want to purchase a 10G device that supports
- 4x 10G port
- 3x full BGP table (ISP) plus about 5 BGP customers
- 10x 1G port
I was attracted to buy an MX-80 with it's 4x 10G ports unblocked.
The downside of the MX80 is that it cannot be processor redundant (only from
240 and up) .
Ex cannot handle large tables.
On Jun 6, 2011 1:16 PM, Correa Adolfo acor...@mcmtelecom.com.mx wrote:
Hi, I want to purchase a 10G device that supports
- 4x 10G port
- 3x full BGP table (ISP) plus about 5 BGP customers
- 10x 1G port
I was attracted to buy an MX-80 with it's 4x 10G ports
...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Correa Adolfo
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 12:21 PM
To: Puck Nether (juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net)
Subject: [j-nsp] 10G BGP EX vs MX series implementation?
Hi, I want to purchase a 10G device that supports
- 4x 10G port
- 3x full
-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Correa Adolfo
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 9:21 AM
To: Puck Nether (juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net)
Subject: [j-nsp] 10G BGP EX vs MX series implementation?
Hi, I want to purchase a 10G device
Thanks Paul, Chris.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stewart [mailto:p...@paulstewart.org]
Sent: lunes, 06 de junio de 2011 12:23 p.m.
To: Correa Adolfo; 'Puck Nether'
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] 10G BGP EX vs MX series implementation?
EX4500 can't handle full tables and the only way to make
-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Correa Adolfo
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 9:21 AM
To: Puck Nether (juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net)
Subject: [j-nsp] 10G BGP EX vs MX series implementation?
Hi, I want to purchase a 10G device that supports
- 4x 10G port
- 3x full BGP table (ISP) plus about 5 BGP
6 matches
Mail list logo
