https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379039
--- Comment #11 from Ivo Raisr ---
First part committed in SVN r16314.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379039
--- Comment #10 from Ivo Raisr ---
Modified the previous patch slightly based on comment by Matthias Schwarzott.
POST(sys_prctl) syscall wrapper needs to take into account that ARG2 might not
need to be nul-terminated.
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379039
Ivo Raisr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #105170|0 |1
is obsolete||
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379039
Ivo Raisr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #105145|0 |1
is obsolete||
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379039
--- Comment #7 from Peter (Stig) Edwards
---
Thank you very much for the patch, I built and tested and it works as expected.
For the changes in coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-linux.c, I was thinking it might
be better to use VKI_TASK_COMM_LEN ( as define
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379039
--- Comment #6 from Ivo Raisr ---
Based on your comment #2, I prepared a patch myself.
Compared to yours, it uses completely different approach.
I will defer to the community to judge which one suits better.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379039
--- Comment #5 from Ivo Raisr ---
Created attachment 105145
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=105145&action=edit
patch utilizing VG_(strnlen) function
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379039
--- Comment #4 from Peter (Stig) Edwards
---
Created attachment 105142
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=105142&action=edit
A hack of a patch that just duplicates the asciiz func with a _limit_len
version.
A hack of a patch that just duplic
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379039
Ivo Raisr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|False positive when passing |syscall wrapper for
|non null ter
