Re: Source not regenerated after new kconfig_compiler executable

2007-05-22 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 14:59, David Faure wrote: > On Tuesday 22 May 2007, Christian Ehrlicher wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Don't know if it's intended or a bug in the dependency chain. The output > > from kconfig_compiler is not regenerated after I installed a new > > kconfig_compiler executable. Theref

Re: Source not regenerated after new kconfig_compiler executable

2007-05-22 Thread Matt Rogers
On May 22, 2007, at 2:13 PM, Christian Ehrlicher wrote: > David Faure schrieb: >> On Tuesday 22 May 2007, Christian Ehrlicher wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Don't know if it's intended or a bug in the dependency chain. The >>> output from kconfig_compiler is not regenerated after I installed >>> a ne

Re: Source not regenerated after new kconfig_compiler executable

2007-05-22 Thread Christian Ehrlicher
David Faure schrieb: On Tuesday 22 May 2007, Christian Ehrlicher wrote: Hi, Don't know if it's intended or a bug in the dependency chain. The output from kconfig_compiler is not regenerated after I installed a new kconfig_compiler executable. Therefore I still got warnings about kstaticdelet

Re: Source not regenerated after new kconfig_compiler executable

2007-05-22 Thread David Faure
On Tuesday 22 May 2007, Christian Ehrlicher wrote: > Hi, > > Don't know if it's intended or a bug in the dependency chain. The output > from kconfig_compiler is not regenerated after I installed a new > kconfig_compiler executable. Therefore I still got warnings about > kstaticdeleter until I d

Source not regenerated after new kconfig_compiler executable

2007-05-22 Thread Christian Ehrlicher
Hi, Don't know if it's intended or a bug in the dependency chain. The output from kconfig_compiler is not regenerated after I installed a new kconfig_compiler executable. Therefore I still got warnings about kstaticdeleter until I delete the sources by myself :) Christian signature.asc De