On Saturday 19 July 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
...
> and more importantly make Debugfull work with CMake 2.6. As I didn't
> find a reference of CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES for cmake 2.4 I've set it
> only for 2.6. Please can you have a look at the attached patch and let
> me know wether thats ok wi
On 19.07.08 10:28:41, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Saturday 19 July 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> ...
> > and more importantly make Debugfull work with CMake 2.6. As I didn't
> > find a reference of CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES for cmake 2.4 I've set it
> > only for 2.6. Please can you have a look
On Saturday 19 July 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 19.07.08 10:28:41, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Saturday 19 July 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > > and more importantly make Debugfull work with CMake 2.6. As I didn't
> > > find a reference of CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES for cmak
On Friday 18 July 2008 23:38:45 Brad King wrote:
> Matthias Kretz wrote:
> > attached is a patch to use the new automoc macro which adds a new target
> > per default on Windows.
>
> Can someone point me to discussion of the original problem, please?
I think most of this was in german and private m
Matthias Kretz schrieb:
On Friday 18 July 2008 23:38:45 Brad King wrote:
Matthias Kretz wrote:
attached is a patch to use the new automoc macro which adds a new target
per default on Windows.
Can someone point me to discussion of the original problem, please?
I think most of this was in germ
On 18.07.08 18:26:58, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> >Damn, actually I have a slight feeling I've asked this already. Any
> >objections against putting this information close to the gcc-version of
> >setting the flags. So neither I nor anybody else need to ask stupid
> >questions
Matthias Kretz schrieb:
Hi,
attached is a patch to use the new automoc macro which adds a new target per
default on Windows.
Please let me know if that is what you want/need and whether I should commit
this.
The patch doesn't look correct to me:
@@ -672,7 +679,11 @@
target_link_l
On Saturday 19 July 2008 12:52:57 Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
> Matthias Kretz schrieb:
> > Hi,
> >
> > attached is a patch to use the new automoc macro which adds a new target
> > per default on Windows.
> >
> > Please let me know if that is what you want/need and whether I should
> > commit this.
Matthias Kretz wrote:
> On Friday 18 July 2008 23:38:45 Brad King wrote:
>> Can someone point me to discussion of the original problem, please?
>
> I think most of this was in german and private mail. So here's a summary:
Okay, thanks.
-Brad
___
Kde-bu
Matthias Kretz wrote:
>- With that make does what I want: execute automoc4 once per target on
> every call to make. If automoc4 decides there's nothing to do it
> doesn't touch any files and so make decides not to recompile the output
> file of automoc4.
So you have basically the rule:
target: so
Thiago Macieira schrieb:
> Matthias Kretz wrote:
>> - With that make does what I want: execute automoc4 once per target on
>> every call to make. If automoc4 decides there's nothing to do it
>> doesn't touch any files and so make decides not to recompile the output
>> file of automoc4.
>
> So you
11 matches
Mail list logo
