Hi!
It's Italian only for now as here is where we found a community of users
and content producers, and since most content is initially coming from
course notes, typing them in LaTeX is one thing, typing + translating them
is another. ;-)
As Jeremy was explaining, I'm very open to have other lang
On 7 December 2014 at 18:15, Carl Symons wrote:
> * Get on with it. John's not attending and not bringing equipment that has
> been used in the expo space in past years. Who can pick up the slack?
What would be needed? A WikiFM contributor is currently studying and living
in Bruxelles (ERASMUS)
On Monday, August 17, 2015 07:46:44 AM Martin Graesslin wrote:
> Hi community,
>
> over the last months I observed the following:
> * people not finding our git repositories
> * people being surprised that our code is not on github
> * some projects starting to use github in addition to our own in
On Saturday, September 19, 2015 02:12:13 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > I would prefer us to be more pragmatic. If an adequate free-software
> > tool exists, lets try to use it. If a proprietary tool provides a
> > better experience lets use that. For my own projects I will advocate
> > reviewboar
On Friday, September 18, 2015 11:43:34 PM Vishesh Handa wrote:
> It depends on our end goal: creating free software or creating free
> software with only free tools? If it is the latter then I fear we have
> already failed since many of us use additional tools to aid
> development which are not fre
On Saturday, September 19, 2015 04:24:13 PM Eike Hein wrote:
> Developer recruitment should be our #1 problem for the
> next two years, and along those lines "GitHub might get
> us contributors" is by far the strongest argument that
> side's come up with.
Somebody once defined Github as the "socia
On Saturday, September 19, 2015 10:58:09 AM Michael Pyne wrote:
> Is anyone actually arguing this point in the way you ask? No one's asking
> to prevent "one offs" entirely, the core of the issue is that KDE
> development should happen *within* KDE-the-whole-community, not *apart
> from* KDE.
Nob
On Saturday, September 19, 2015 04:26:04 PM Luigi Toscano wrote:
> But that's not using the pull request. Such workflow would mean that the
> pull request is not accepted anyway, but the code is pushed through the
> infrastructure and not trough Github interface.
>
> Just to be sure, question for
I understand the takeover concern, it is a valid point. If I become the
maintainer of application X, which was accepting pull requests, and I don't
want to have a github account, I either have to create an account, find
somebody on the team who wants to monitor pull requests, or change the
proj
On Saturday, September 19, 2015 05:47:38 PM Martin Graesslin wrote:
> On Saturday, September 19, 2015 5:32:33 PM CEST Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > If the problem is somewhere in (a), where is it?
>
> I'm afraid of code review happening through the pull request instead of our
> infrastructure. To me g
Hi all,
(hoping to break the thousands of emails currently being written...) we're
having our first sprint at WikiToLearn!!!
It's an exciting news since most of the participants are absolutely newcomers
to FOSS development (let alone to KDE), and to various degrees to WikiToLearn
too. The contr
On Saturday, September 19, 2015 06:22:17 PM Martin Graesslin wrote:
> And how do we do that? Can we enforce this technically or will that be
> weakened over the time the same way as we just turned the mirror into
> "let's accept pull requests"?
There is no way to enforce this technically, it has
On Saturday, September 19, 2015 06:44:24 PM Martin Graesslin wrote:
> No reality would be that it slowly moves code review from KDE to github. And
> I think we have here quite some people in the discussion who would love to
> see that
I don't think anyone ever thought that... o.o
-Riccardo
On Saturday, September 19, 2015 01:17:18 PM Martin Klapetek wrote:
> To further expand on the idea, the workflow would be as follows:
>
> * bot looks through our repos
> * bot finds a pull request
> * bot downloads the diff between requested branch and mirror HEAD
> * bot uploads it to phabricator
On Saturday, September 19, 2015 07:55:08 PM Eike Hein wrote:
> That doesn't address Sune's concern though. If you
> get a patch by email you can reply by email; the
> comm channel stays the same. Ditto IRC. If you file
> a pull req on GitHub and it gets imported into Phab
> which you don't have an
On Saturday, September 19, 2015 04:17:11 PM Martin Klapetek wrote:
> so I haven't really organized any sprints myself but have participated
> in many, some good, some less good. So here's my personal take
> on this speaking from experience:
Thanks, it was really appreciated!
For those wondering, I
On Sunday, September 20, 2015 10:35:19 AM Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2015-09-20, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > But effectively it won't be reviews because the KDE reviewers won't use
> > it.
> > Or do you think we need some dracon law because our community cannot do
> > self-control?
>
> I have just
On Sunday, September 20, 2015 12:26:41 PM Sune Vuorela wrote:
> Free software needs free tools.
I am sorry, but sadly this is not the state of the art. KDE has been created
with many non free tools and currently co-exists in many non-free
environments. We can either decide to live with it and im
On Sunday, September 20, 2015 02:39:53 PM Loïc Grobol wrote:
> IIRC the main argument was not laziness, it was discoverability. But
> if we have a nice wiki page to guide people in the switching process,
> it should be relatively painless. In any way, we can still try and see
> if the issue actuall
On Sunday, September 20, 2015 03:01:09 PM Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Riccardo Iaconelli ha scritto:
> > On Sunday, September 20, 2015 12:26:41 PM Sune Vuorela wrote:
> >> Free software needs free tools.
> >
> > I am sorry, but sadly this is not the state of the art. KDE h
On Sunday, September 20, 2015 01:51:19 PM Laszlo Papp wrote:
> I just do not happen to see this case strong enough to support,
> personally. We have not even tried to see how the mirror works out,
> and we already think of whether or not it is a big problem not
> allowing pull requests, et al. It i
On Sunday, September 20, 2015 03:01:09 PM Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Riccardo Iaconelli ha scritto:
> > On Sunday, September 20, 2015 12:26:41 PM Sune Vuorela wrote:
> >> Free software needs free tools.
> >
> > I am sorry, but sadly this is not the state of the art. KDE h
On Sunday, September 20, 2015 06:39:02 PM Bhushan Shah wrote:
> We don't need to replace Facebook.. tada.
>
> Facebook is not part of our development nor anything.. So lets not
> compare with facebook.. When we talk about github and do our reviews
> there. It will be recorded there and if github g
Hi,
I feel like the threads on github are becoming a little bit unordered. This is
my attempt to re-organize the key concepts, concerns and positions (please
pardon me in advance if I didn't understand all the positions correctly).
Please answer if you have additional positions, but let's try t
On Sunday, September 20, 2015 10:50:43 AM Martin Klapetek wrote:
> Gnome in their years history of github mirroring had 4 pull requests
> (it was mentioned in the other thread...one of the others).
>
> So we might very likely be talking non-issues here anyway.
100% agreed
-Riccardo
___
On Thursday, September 24, 2015 07:35:41 PM Valorie Zimmerman wrote:
> I really do not want the excellent parts of this impassioned
> discussion to get lost! We've wondered about it before, and perhaps it
> is time to look at this issue again.
A web ui?
I think that more and more github should be
On Friday, September 25, 2015 01:16:46 PM Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> e.g. Gitlab?
It is more freedesktop.org... The software is not a problem (gitlab for that
works amazing), but I was more looking to two points:
* a real a community hosting (not https://about.gitlab.com/terms/ )
* more importan
On 25 September 2015 at 23:33, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> AFAIR last time we tried gitlab it crawled under "KDE size" scenario, so
> unless it has improved it would not work with KDE + more stuff.
should we try to get more powerful machines...? ;-)
-Riccardo
--
Pace Peace Paix Paz Frieden Pax P
Just FYI, I plan on submitting a talk... I am not sure what I could need
help with, but in case you have ideas, please reach to me :-)
-Riccardo
Il 28/set/2015 09:19 AM, "Lydia Pintscher" ha scritto:
> Hey folks :)
>
> Pau was awesome and already requested the devroom and stand for us for
> FOSD
Hi all,
I just submitted a WikiToLearn talk at FOSDEM this year, as I anticipated.
I asked for a keynote slot, let's see if I get it or it gets moved to the
main track... ;-)
Here's title, subtitle and abstract:
Bringing academia to the Internet era
- How open textbooks will change teaching and
On 22 October 2015 at 13:56, Pau Garcia i Quiles
wrote:
> The devroom has been confirmed. We will publish a call for talks in week.
>
I have submitted my KDE talk as a keynote or main track.
Is there any overlap?
Bye,
-Riccardo
--
Pace Peace Paix Paz Frieden Pax Pokój Friður Fred Béke 和平
Hasit
On Monday, November 02, 2015 09:21:33 PM Gustav González wrote:
> The latest months I wasn't in the mood even to answer some mails mentioning
> Tupi in this list, so I chose to wait for the right moment to send this
> message, and I think it is today.
>
> The KDE community is great and I really ap
On Monday, November 30, 2015 07:16:47 PM Valorie Zimmerman wrote:
> As of right now, we have 44 tasks. That is about 130 fewer than
> Staphanie recommends. We've never fallen short before, and I believe
> that we won't this time either. But without Freenode for the past few
> days, I feel very out-
On Monday, December 07, 2015 01:11:22 PM Olivier Churlaud wrote:
> So should I create a doodle? Or open a forum and put the link here? And
> how do we organize the discussion ahead to plan everything? Forum or ML?
>
> How much time ahead should it be prepared? I mean: what is reasonable
> for a
On Thursday, December 10, 2015 12:35:18 AM Harshit Dwivedi wrote:
> Hey guys,
> I had a look at the conversation and would be glad to help you guys on this.
> Though I won't be able to participate in a sprint physically (unless you
> guys are having it here in India :p), but I will be helping you r
On Thursday, December 10, 2015 02:53:25 PM Varun Joshi wrote:
> Hi,
> If there's any way I could help, I'd like to participate (remotely) too!
We'll post updates and definitely make sure you guys are involved! :-)
ping me if we're too silent!
-Riccardo
__
On Wednesday, December 09, 2015 06:26:59 PM Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> And there's only 1 talk that has been submitted from KDE, please consider
> what is interesting in KDE that you can talk about and submit a talk
> http://www.elpauer.org/2015/12/extension-fosdem-2016-desktops-devroom-call->
> fo
On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 10:26:24 PM Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> Please submit your talk to the Desktops DevRoom NOW. We have already
> started voting in Desktops. The main committee is late this year. In case
> your talk is selected by both main and desktops, you'll decide what you
> want to
On Thursday, January 28, 2016 10:40:41 PM Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> into the episode, but I wouldn't know which one) in which the following
> line of dialogue is heard: "Oh, I see you use GNOME. I'm more a KDE guy
> myself."
we should ask to correct the dubbing to "I'm more of a Plasma guy myself
On Thursday, February 04, 2016 08:53:57 AM Alexander Dymo wrote:
> Let's say it wants to join KDE. Under the
> "inclusive" proposal such a project will be welcomed. Under "focused"
> - no.
The vision document will never be a metric to accept or refuse a project.
The manifesto is the only document
On Friday, February 05, 2016 08:01:49 AM Alexander Dymo wrote:
> As Lydia put it, it will be a clear frame of reference to make
> choices in.
No way.
Quoting Ben Cooksley:
This criteria has already been laid out by the KDE Community, in a
document called the Manifesto.
It lays out fairly clearly
On Friday, February 05, 2016 08:40:21 AM Alexander Dymo wrote:
> You
> can satisfy all the requirements in the manifesto, but still be a bad
> candidate for a KDE project. As the extreme example, one could fork
> Plasma and want to join KDE. There are less extreme cases.
I wonder why you say that
On Monday, February 08, 2016 01:12:51 PM Alexander Dymo wrote:
> We pointed many times that the focus is on free software
> for mobile: hybrid laptop, tablet, phone, and any existing or future
> personal computing device.
So your vision wants KDE to target mobile computing? What about desktops,
On Tuesday, February 09, 2016 09:24:43 PM Lydia Pintscher wrote:
> But more seriously: Wikimedia's vision doesn't say that all the
> knowledge has to be with Wikimedia - just that it must be universally
> and freely accessible.
... which is, incidentally, the reason why they have been helping us a
On 11 February 2016 at 22:06, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> so do I understand correctly that in general you would consider projects
> like
> a shell, a compiler and a text-mode editor as potential KDE projects ?
>
I honestly still find it strange that in this discussion we insist on
drawing a cir
Il 16 feb 2016 8:35 AM, "Ben Cooksley" ha scritto:
> >
> > PS: Any update on possible solutions for the wikis?
>
> It's a work in progress, requiring a full Mediawiki update and all the
> challenges that implies.
>
Do you want to move parts of it within WikiToLearn and our new
infrastructure? O
Hi,
On 16 February 2016 at 12:07, Dominik Haumann wrote:
> I think my techbase account still has admin rights.
> That is, I can also change the rights of others, and lock down pages etc.
> If someone is interested, I can probably give rights to others, too.
>
You need bureaucrat rights for that
On 16 February 2016 at 15:01, Ingo Malchow wrote:
> Most of the needed parts are already done. What is still missing is the
> login,
> which should be based on Oauth2 over phabricator. If you have any knowledge
> about this, or some code flying around, feel free to send it over to me ;)
>
This,
On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 10:12:06 AM Mario Fux wrote:
> As I see it the "graphical user interfaces and applications" (which is an
> enumeration of different paradigms/things anyway could/should be
> substituted with "software" and there would be an agreement more or less
> between the two
On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 07:37:07 PM Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> "KDE creates technology for a world in which everyone has freedom,
> privacy and control over their digital life."
>
> isn't a conflation of vision and mission. I wondered whether the actual
> vision isn't just the second part, i.e
On 12 April 2016 at 01:13, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> From what I see on the wiki, there are three questions we should try to answer
> first:
>
> 1. Should the mission focus mostly on our organizational/community strategy,
> our product strategy, or both?
I think we should aim for how we handle the
Hi,
On 24 April 2016 at 21:34, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> Nevertheless a comment about the "end-user webservices": AFAIK OwnCloud and
> WikiToLearn are quite different. OwnCloud is a developing a software, while
> WikiToLearn is mainly about creating content (for a MediaWiki).
> IMO creating con
On sabato 7 maggio 2016 18:23:10 CEST Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
> I wonder why nobody
> examined this POV before starting to shift to Telegram. In this regard
> Mattermost appears to make much more sense as we could run it on our
> own servers, if we really need a phone client.
Speaking as maint
On martedì 10 maggio 2016 09:42:06 CEST Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > Speaking as maintainer of a project which heavily uses Telegram: it allows
> > backlogging and it is usable from behind any connection. For me it is
> > impossible to connect to IRC from the University, the University campus or
> > the
Hi all,
I have recently met Daniele Scasciafratte, a Mozilla representative, at a
conference in Albania.
He's a long time KDE fan, and when he learned about WikiToLearn he thought it
was a fantastic idea to promote through the Firefox Students Ambassadors
program. Here's one thread he opened t
Hi,
On 23 May 2016 at 19:28, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> 3. Added another question for the contributors "Which category or categories
> of projects have you contributed to most recently?", multi-select, with the
> options
> [ ] Plasma
> [ ] Applications
> [ ] Frameworks
> [ ] Meta (sysadmin, web)
>
Hi,
On 28 June 2016 at 23:50, Sven Brauch wrote:
> I trust you are aware of the biasing the amount of participants from the
> different areas introduces and aim to provide the results of the poll in
> a form which is transparent with respect to this bias.
I guess we will never take absolute numb
Hi,
On 18 July 2016 at 16:58, Filipe Saraiva wrote:
> If there is some interest in this test, please let me know and I can
> foward the reply for them.
at WikiToLearn we set up a test instance on one of our staging servers.
You can login with phabricator details on https://chat.wikitolearn.org ;
Hi all,
On 20 September 2016 at 19:04, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> Added:
> "Content on collaborative edited websites such as wikis must be
> licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 4.0
> International."
> Rationale: we have no policy for wikis but they are very important to
> us
On 23 September 2016 at 18:52, Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Still, as I mentioned, it would introduced problems if we move documentation
> forth and back from wikis to other formats, and also with mixing content from
> older documentation. I still don't buy the "cumbersome" argument, I don't
> think we
I also gave away about 500 stickers I bought from moo.com - they were cheap
and nice, lots of people were taking it!
Bye,
-Riccardo
On 15 February 2017 at 16:17, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> I also gave away £113 worth of KDE stickers I bought from
> handylabels.co.uk. These were very popular and
On 8 August 2017 at 20:01, Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Can rocket.chat be bridged too? If not, promoting it would create another
> island.
With Brooklyn, you can create n-ways bridges between Rocket.chat, IRC,
Telegram and possibly many more. All of this while handling attachment
support, replies, an
On 8 August 2017 at 21:46, Riccardo Iaconelli wrote:
> I believe that we will only solve this problem when, no matter what
> underlying technologies we choose, we will be able to provide a user
> experience as nice as Telegram with a simple server, hosted by us,
> which allows for fed
On 9 August 2017 at 10:46, Elvis Angelaccio wrote:
> On the other hand, I see new contributors on IRC all the time who ask "hey,
> how do I build $app?" or "hey, how do I contribute to KDE?". So maybe
> different teams have just different preferences. So I'm still not convinced
> that a new contri
Hi Ben,
On lunedì 16 settembre 2019 08:03:31 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> The content of notes.kde.org will be exported - likely in ODT format -
> prior to us shutting it down.
> The resulting files will be made available on share.kde.org.
>
> If there are things which need to be resolved prior to
On venerdì 6 marzo 2020 07:40:49 CET Martin Flöser wrote:
> And reading the screenshot I think that's the problem. We state in our
> privacy policy about 3rd party plugins and Akonadi. Especially Akonadi
> is a "transfer of data to others" and that allows all applications to
> access the data. I
Hi Luis,
that is amazing news!!
Would you consider adding a PublicCode to your repo? It's a metadata format
for indexing and providing a catalog of open source solutions to Public
Administrations
You can find an online editor here:
https://publiccode-editor.developers.italia.it/ and more info on
Hi Christoph,
You pinged us yesterday afternoon, please consider daily jobs and life
outside KDE, and if possible wait at least a couple of days before assuming
the project is dead.
The project is still active indeed, even if clearly not as explosively
growing as in 2016-2017. To this, the mailin
P.s. On t.me/wtleditnotification you will find a bot notifying of all
recent edits.
This could be a great starting point to assess the situation. If the
community wants to help please feel free to poke me on Matrix
(@ruphy:KDE.org) or via mail
Riccardo
Il dom 14 feb 2021, 17:58 Christoph Cullmann
n we further help.
> >
> > A presto!
> > Luis
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 17:32:18 +0100
> > Riccardo Iaconelli wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Luis,
> > >
> > > that is amazing news!!
> > > Would you cons
70 matches
Mail list logo
