On Monday 06 January 2014 08:36:14 Christoph Cullmann wrote:
Is it really enough to init a new repository and have that one initial
commit + add (and then move the files around inside the new git) to have
history via grafting available? There is no other trick behind I just
don't see ATM?
Hi!
I have tried to build KF5 from scratch. When running ./kdesrc-build, I get
the following:
david@nimfa:~/devel/kf5-development$ ./kdesrc-build
Script started processing at Mon Jan 6 11:53:41 2014
* Downloading projects.kde.org project database...
Updating kde-build-metadata (to branch
On Monday 06 January 2014 12:03:26 David Gil Oliva wrote:
I have checked that
/home/david/devel/kf5-development/kde-build-metadata/dependency-data-common
doesn't exist.
Indeed; chicken and egg problem (I was waiting for kdesrc-build to support it
before moving stuff to it).
Created now, does
Hello,
On Monday 06 January 2014 09:33:38 Martin Graesslin wrote:
On Monday 06 January 2014 07:52:50 Kevin Ottens wrote:
The current list of modules is there:
http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List
As you can see there's quite some holes in the table, and quite a few
entries marked
I see, yeah, thats KatePart it seems to me.
Anyway, I am all for going to have a KF5 KTextEditor framework, will make it
more approachable
for other projects to use it.
And unlike in 4.x, KTextEditor would always provide the implementation
directly (KatePart merged in, internally)
and
Yes, it works.
Thanks!
David Gil
El 06/01/2014 13:49, David Faure fa...@kde.org va escriure:
On Monday 06 January 2014 12:03:26 David Gil Oliva wrote:
I have checked that
/home/david/devel/kf5-development/kde-build-metadata/dependency-data-common
doesn't exist.
Indeed; chicken and egg
On Monday 06 January 2014 23:54:46 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Monday 06 January 2014 22:26:27 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
IMO something like proposing the maintainers and approving them,
similar to Qt, would be good, i.e. at least some kind of
voting by who we will be governed.
Definitely
Am Montag, 6. Januar 2014, 21:44:46 schrieb Christoph Cullmann:
I see, yeah, thats KatePart it seems to me.
Anyway, I am all for going to have a KF5 KTextEditor framework, will make
it more approachable
for other projects to use it.
And unlike in 4.x, KTextEditor would always provide
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Kevin Funk k...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Montag, 6. Januar 2014, 21:44:46 schrieb Christoph Cullmann:
I see, yeah, thats KatePart it seems to me.
Anyway, I am all for going to have a KF5 KTextEditor framework, will
make
it more approachable
for other
On Monday 06 January 2014 07:52:50 Kevin Ottens wrote:
The current list of modules is there:
http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List
As you can see there's quite some holes in the table, and quite a few
entries marked unmaintained. KDE Frameworks as a set of technologies will
only be
Le mardi 31 décembre 2013 12:42:22 Martin Graesslin a écrit :
On Tuesday 31 December 2013 12:15:09 David Faure wrote:
QSystemTrayIcon = KNotificationItem
No clue. I can't even find KNotificationItem in KF5 anywhere !?!?
In fact it doesn't exist in kdelibs4 either.
I think it
Hello,
On Monday 06 January 2014 09:33:38 Martin Graesslin wrote:
On Monday 06 January 2014 07:52:50 Kevin Ottens wrote:
The current list of modules is there:
http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List
As you can see there's quite some holes in the table, and quite a few
entries marked
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114889/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Repository: kio
Description
---
Seems
On Monday 06 January 2014, Kevin Ottens wrote:
Hello all,
Now that TP1 is almost out of the door, it is time to move toward the final
release and put in place the governance of KDE Frameworks. It is a very
large and multi-faceted product, so we will need people with longer term
commitment
On Monday 06 January 2014 22:26:27 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
IMO something like proposing the maintainers and approving them, similar to
Qt, would be good, i.e. at least some kind of voting by who we will be
governed.
Definitely something we'll need at some point. For bootstrapping I'm more
On Monday 06 January 2014 23:54:46 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Monday 06 January 2014 22:26:27 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
IMO something like proposing the maintainers and approving them,
similar to Qt, would be good, i.e. at least some kind of
voting by who we will be governed.
Definitely
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112335/#review46952
---
Hey hugo, is this in somehow now that oxygen uses KStyle
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/64/#review46953
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/64/
---
(Updated Jan. 7, 2014, 5:50 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Dec. 26, 2013, 1:57 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
Hm, you broke the comment :)
What do you mean? It all works fine here.
- Luis
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
On Dec. 26, 2013, 1:57 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
Hm, you broke the comment :)
Luis Silva wrote:
What do you mean? It all works fine here.
Yes, because the compiler does not read comments.
- Christoph
---
This is an
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114632/
---
(Updated Jan. 6, 2014, 5:47 p.m.)
Review request for Baloo and Vishesh
On Dec. 26, 2013, 1:57 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
Hm, you broke the comment :)
Luis Silva wrote:
What do you mean? It all works fine here.
Christoph Feck wrote:
Yes, because the compiler does not read comments.
Thomas Lübking wrote:
Aside this, the approach seems too
On Dec. 26, 2013, 1:57 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
Hm, you broke the comment :)
Luis Silva wrote:
What do you mean? It all works fine here.
Christoph Feck wrote:
Yes, because the compiler does not read comments.
Thomas Lübking wrote:
Aside this, the approach seems too
On Dec. 26, 2013, 1:57 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
Hm, you broke the comment :)
Luis Silva wrote:
What do you mean? It all works fine here.
Christoph Feck wrote:
Yes, because the compiler does not read comments.
Thomas Lübking wrote:
Aside this, the approach seems too
On Dec. 26, 2013, 1:57 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
Hm, you broke the comment :)
Luis Silva wrote:
What do you mean? It all works fine here.
Christoph Feck wrote:
Yes, because the compiler does not read comments.
Thomas Lübking wrote:
Aside this, the approach seems too
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114393/#review46941
---
Has this been submitted? if so, please close the review.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107415/#review46944
---
Kai can you finish the patch please? I'd like to include it
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114160/
---
(Updated Jan. 7, 2014, 5:35 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114172/#review46947
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Àlex Fiestas
On Nov. 28, 2013, 8:35
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114280/
---
(Updated Jan. 7, 2014, 5:36 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108503/#review46949
---
Is the added i18n string already in the catalog? If so please
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108503/#review46950
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Àlex Fiestas
On Feb. 11, 2013, 10:14
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109491/
---
(Updated Jan. 7, 2014, 5:42 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
34 matches
Mail list logo
