On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 8:57 AM Milian Wolff wrote:
>
> On Montag, 25. November 2019 22:57:11 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El dissabte, 23 de novembre de 2019, a les 11:47:40 CET, Milian Wolff va
> escriure:
> > > On Mittwoch, 19. Juni 2019 19:57:56 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > > El
El dimarts, 26 de novembre de 2019, a les 8:56:54 CET, Milian Wolff va escriure:
> On Montag, 25. November 2019 22:57:11 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El dissabte, 23 de novembre de 2019, a les 11:47:40 CET, Milian Wolff va
> escriure:
> > > On Mittwoch, 19. Juni 2019 19:57:56 CET Albert
On Montag, 25. November 2019 22:57:11 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El dissabte, 23 de novembre de 2019, a les 11:47:40 CET, Milian Wolff va
escriure:
> > On Mittwoch, 19. Juni 2019 19:57:56 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > El dimarts, 18 de juny de 2019, a les 12:04:38 CEST, David Edmundson
El dissabte, 23 de novembre de 2019, a les 11:47:40 CET, Milian Wolff va
escriure:
> On Mittwoch, 19. Juni 2019 19:57:56 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El dimarts, 18 de juny de 2019, a les 12:04:38 CEST, David Edmundson va
> escriure:
> > > > Are we sure it's fair to assume people have SSD?
On Mittwoch, 19. Juni 2019 19:57:56 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El dimarts, 18 de juny de 2019, a les 12:04:38 CEST, David Edmundson va
escriure:
> > > Are we sure it's fair to assume people have SSD? our of the 4 laptops i
> > > own, only 2 have SSD.>
> > It's at least safe to assume it's
On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 at 11:21, David Edmundson
wrote:
>
> Benchmarks of dolphin on a low end ARM laptop:
> Dolphin via QProcess: 1233ms
> Dolphin via Kinit: 1144ms
>
> again a consistent saving in the order of ~7%
>
> Initially I had wanted to scrap it, I'm now very conflicted.
>
> I'll try to
Benchmarks of dolphin on a low end ARM laptop:
Dolphin via QProcess: 1233ms
Dolphin via Kinit: 1144ms
again a consistent saving in the order of ~7%
Initially I had wanted to scrap it, I'm now very conflicted.
I'll try to port all of plasma services to use it properly again and
see what
El dimarts, 18 de juny de 2019, a les 12:04:38 CEST, David Edmundson va
escriure:
> > Are we sure it's fair to assume people have SSD? our of the 4 laptops i
> > own, only 2 have SSD.
>
> It's at least safe to assume it's the trend moving forward.
>
> > Do you think it's worth me trying in one
On Wed, 19 Jun 2019, 16:39 Aleix Pol, wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 12:05 PM David Edmundson
> wrote:
> >
> > > Are we sure it's fair to assume people have SSD? our of the 4 laptops
> i own, only 2 have SSD.
> >
> > It's at least safe to assume it's the trend moving forward.
> >
> > > Do you
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 12:05 PM David Edmundson
wrote:
>
> > Are we sure it's fair to assume people have SSD? our of the 4 laptops i
> > own, only 2 have SSD.
>
> It's at least safe to assume it's the trend moving forward.
>
> > Do you think it's worth me trying in one of the two that don't
> Seems like this would need some refocusing if we want to keep it?
Definitely. We've essentially broken all of it right now.
My goal for the research and this thread is to try and get a definitive
kde-wide answer to "if we want to keep it" so I know where to put work in.
> Are we sure it's fair to assume people have SSD? our of the 4 laptops i own,
> only 2 have SSD.
It's at least safe to assume it's the trend moving forward.
> Do you think it's worth me trying in one of the two that don't have SSD?
More data is normally a good thing. If you or anyone else
On Monday, 17 June 2019 21:34:38 CEST David Edmundson wrote:
> > Which libraries are covered by this mechanism nowadays? The impact is of
> > course bigger the more of the dependencies of the applications are already
> > loaded. When this was developed this was a small amount of relatively
> >
El dilluns, 17 de juny de 2019, a les 11:56:15 CEST, David Edmundson va
escriure:
> Results:
> (Showing the median out of 5 runs on a mid range SSD desktop)
Are we sure it's fair to assume people have SSD? our of the 4 laptops i own,
only 2 have SSD.
Do you think it's worth me trying in one of
> Which libraries are covered by this mechanism nowadays? The impact is of
> course bigger the more of the dependencies of the applications are already
> loaded. When this was developed this was a small amount of relatively large Qt
> and kdelibs libraries. I'm wondering if the current subset is
Thanks for the very interesting and useful research!
On Monday, 17 June 2019 11:56:15 CEST David Edmundson wrote:
> From API.kde.org:
> >Using kdeinit to launch KDE applications makes starting a typical KDE
> >applications 2.5 times faster (100ms instead of 250ms on a P-III 500)
> Certainly
Hi,
On 2019-06-17 11:56, David Edmundson wrote:
From API.kde.org:
Using kdeinit to launch KDE applications makes starting a typical KDE
applications 2.5 times faster (100ms instead of 250ms on a P-III 500)
Certainly sounds like a good thing.
===The current State===
==Plasma==
* Apps
>From API.kde.org:
>Using kdeinit to launch KDE applications makes starting a typical KDE
>applications 2.5 times faster (100ms instead of 250ms on a P-III 500)
Certainly sounds like a good thing.
===The current State===
==Plasma==
* Apps launched from the plasma menu skip klauncher and
18 matches
Mail list logo
