Review Request 123075: do not require X11 on Mac OS X

2015-03-19 Thread Harald Fernengel
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123075/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Michael Palimaka. Repository: kdesu

Re: Review Request 123075: do not require X11 on Mac OS X

2015-03-19 Thread Jeremy Whiting
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123075/#review3 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Jeremy Whiting On March 19, 2015, 4:59

Re: Review Request 123075: do not require X11 on Mac OS X

2015-03-20 Thread Martin Gräßlin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123075/#review9 --- as in other similar requests: -2 from my side - Martin Gräßli

Re: Review Request 123075: do not require X11 on Mac OS X

2015-03-20 Thread Martin Gräßlin
> On March 20, 2015, 8:07 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > as in other similar requests: -2 from my side To extend: I think the way is wrong. If it now builds on MacOS the required is wrong. It should be an optional find_package properly ifdefed. - Martin

Re: Review Request 123075: do not require X11 on Mac OS X

2015-03-20 Thread Christoph Cullmann
> On March 20, 2015, 7:07 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > as in other similar requests: -2 from my side > > Martin Gräßlin wrote: > To extend: I think the way is wrong. If it now builds on MacOS the > required is wrong. It should be an optional find_package properly ifdefed. Actually, you

Re: Review Request 123075: do not require X11 on Mac OS X

2015-03-20 Thread Martin Gräßlin
> On March 20, 2015, 8:07 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > as in other similar requests: -2 from my side > > Martin Gräßlin wrote: > To extend: I think the way is wrong. If it now builds on MacOS the > required is wrong. It should be an optional find_package properly ifdefed. > > Christoph

Re: Review Request 123075: do not require X11 on Mac OS X

2015-03-20 Thread Christoph Cullmann
> On March 20, 2015, 7:07 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > as in other similar requests: -2 from my side > > Martin Gräßlin wrote: > To extend: I think the way is wrong. If it now builds on MacOS the > required is wrong. It should be an optional find_package properly ifdefed. > > Christoph

Re: Review Request 123075: do not require X11 on Mac OS X

2015-03-20 Thread Martin Gräßlin
> On March 20, 2015, 8:07 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > as in other similar requests: -2 from my side > > Martin Gräßlin wrote: > To extend: I think the way is wrong. If it now builds on MacOS the > required is wrong. It should be an optional find_package properly ifdefed. > > Christoph

Re: Review Request 123075: do not require X11 on Mac OS X

2015-03-20 Thread Christoph Cullmann
> On March 20, 2015, 7:07 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > as in other similar requests: -2 from my side > > Martin Gräßlin wrote: > To extend: I think the way is wrong. If it now builds on MacOS the > required is wrong. It should be an optional find_package properly ifdefed. > > Christoph

Re: Review Request 123075: do not require X11 on Mac OS X

2015-03-20 Thread Martin Gräßlin
> On March 20, 2015, 8:07 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > as in other similar requests: -2 from my side > > Martin Gräßlin wrote: > To extend: I think the way is wrong. If it now builds on MacOS the > required is wrong. It should be an optional find_package properly ifdefed. > > Christoph

Re: Review Request 123075: do not require X11 on Mac OS X

2015-03-20 Thread Christoph Cullmann
> On March 20, 2015, 7:07 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > as in other similar requests: -2 from my side > > Martin Gräßlin wrote: > To extend: I think the way is wrong. If it now builds on MacOS the > required is wrong. It should be an optional find_package properly ifdefed. > > Christoph

Re: Review Request 123075: do not require X11 on Mac OS X

2015-03-20 Thread Martin Gräßlin
> On March 20, 2015, 8:07 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > as in other similar requests: -2 from my side > > Martin Gräßlin wrote: > To extend: I think the way is wrong. If it now builds on MacOS the > required is wrong. It should be an optional find_package properly ifdefed. > > Christoph

Re: Review Request 123075: do not require X11 on Mac OS X

2015-06-13 Thread Marko Käning
> On March 20, 2015, 8:07 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > as in other similar requests: -2 from my side > > Martin Gräßlin wrote: > To extend: I think the way is wrong. If it now builds on MacOS the > required is wrong. It should be an optional find_package properly ifdefed. > > Christoph

Re: Review Request 123075: do not require X11 on Mac OS X

2015-06-13 Thread Martin Gräßlin
> On March 20, 2015, 8:07 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > as in other similar requests: -2 from my side > > Martin Gräßlin wrote: > To extend: I think the way is wrong. If it now builds on MacOS the > required is wrong. It should be an optional find_package properly ifdefed. > > Christoph

Re: Review Request 123075: do not require X11 on Mac OS X

2017-06-01 Thread Harald Fernengel
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123075/ --- (Updated June 1, 2017, 1:20 p.m.) Status -- This change has been dis