On 16/08/2022 12:52, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 10:57:20 -0400
> Alan Stern wrote:
>
>>> static int trace_die_panic_handler(struct notifier_block *self,
>>> unsigned long ev, void *unused)
>>> {
>>> if (!ftrace_dump_on_oops)
>>> return
On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 10:57:20 -0400
Alan Stern wrote:
> > static int trace_die_panic_handler(struct notifier_block *self,
> > unsigned long ev, void *unused)
> > {
> > if (!ftrace_dump_on_oops)
> > return NOTIFY_DONE;
> >
> > /* The die notifier
On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 16:53:21 -0300
"Guilherme G. Piccoli" wrote:
Sorry for the late review, but this fell to the bottom of my queue :-/
> +/*
> + * The idea is to execute the following die/panic callback early, in order
> + * to avoid showing irrelevant information in the trace (like other
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 10:14:45AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 16:53:21 -0300
> "Guilherme G. Piccoli" wrote:
>
>
> Sorry for the late review, but this fell to the bottom of my queue :-/
>
> > +/*
> > + * The idea is to execute the following die/panic callback early, in
On 19/07/2022 16:53, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> Currently the tracing dump_on_oops feature is implemented
> through separate notifiers, one for die/oops and the other
> for panic - given they have the same functionality, let's
> unify them.
>
> Also improve the function comment and change the
On 03/08/2022 06:52, Baoquan He wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Although the switch-case code of original trace_die_handler() is werid,
>> this unification is not much more comfortable. Just personal feeling
>> from code style, not strong opinion. Leave it to trace reviewers.
>
> Please ignore this
On 08/03/22 at 05:36pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 07/19/22 at 04:53pm, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> > Currently the tracing dump_on_oops feature is implemented
> > through separate notifiers, one for die/oops and the other
> > for panic - given they have the same functionality, let's
> > unify them.
On 07/19/22 at 04:53pm, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> Currently the tracing dump_on_oops feature is implemented
> through separate notifiers, one for die/oops and the other
> for panic - given they have the same functionality, let's
> unify them.
>
> Also improve the function comment and change
Currently the tracing dump_on_oops feature is implemented
through separate notifiers, one for die/oops and the other
for panic - given they have the same functionality, let's
unify them.
Also improve the function comment and change the priority of
the notifier to make it execute earlier, avoiding
