Re: [Kicad-developers] Release 4.0.5 tagged.

2016-12-06 Thread Nick Østergaard
But this will not help if the user is using them locally. How is that supposed to be handled? 2016-12-07 0:46 GMT+01:00 Carl Poirier : > Hi Nick, > > I do understand but it is not an issue, Just try it out, go to > https://github.com/KiCad/Buttons_Switches_ThroughHole.pretty. > > Carl > > On Tue,

Re: [Kicad-developers] Release 4.0.5 tagged.

2016-12-06 Thread Carl Poirier
Hi Nick, I do understand but it is not an issue, Just try it out, go to https://github.com/KiCad/Buttons_Switches_ThroughHole.pretty. Carl On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote: > Hi Carl > > I have found an issue with the lib tagging. I think we decided to not > remove any lib

Re: [Kicad-developers] Release 4.0.5 tagged.

2016-12-06 Thread Nick Østergaard
Hi Carl I have found an issue with the lib tagging. I think we decided to not remove any libs for the patch releaes. That is for releases where only the third number changes. What I see is: Buttons_Switches_ThroughHole.pretty remaned to Buttons_Switches_THT.pretty Capacitors_ThroughHole.pretty re

[Kicad-developers] Anyone with a "Intel HD Graphics 520"?

2016-12-06 Thread Mário Luzeiro
Does anyone here has a "Intel HD Graphics 520" on Windows 7 64b (or maybe Windows 10)? There is a bug report that it is crashing the 3D-Viewer just by resizing/maxime it: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1627337 If so could you verify if 3Dviewer is working for you ? :) Regards, Mario Luz

Re: [Kicad-developers] Ideas for a lightweight KiCad PDM

2016-12-06 Thread Kevin Bortis
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Clemens Koller wrote: > Hello, Kevin! > > I fully support your ideas. In a commercial environment, a proper PDM including version management and documentation is mandatory to be able to deliver a product where you can realize a traceability down to the date code of

Re: [Kicad-developers] Ideas for a lightweight KiCad PDM

2016-12-06 Thread Kevin Bortis
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > On 12/6/2016 2:22 AM, Kevin Bortis wrote: >> Hi >> >> I try to figure out how it would be possible to create a central >> storage for symbols, footprints and other design data. With central I >> mean something like a design data server, wher

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] [PATCH] simple C++ tests

2016-12-06 Thread Michael Steinberg
Hello, I played around a bit and settled on a quick&easy solution. For running the tests on windows binding to the shared libs is a problem with our default build, because we have separate output directories per target. Only after an install operation are they in one directory for proper libr

Re: [Kicad-developers] Ideas for a lightweight KiCad PDM

2016-12-06 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
On 12/6/2016 2:22 AM, Kevin Bortis wrote: > Hi > > I try to figure out how it would be possible to create a central > storage for symbols, footprints and other design data. With central I > mean something like a design data server, where it is possible to > assign workflows with sign-offs, make pr

Re: [Kicad-developers] Ideas for a lightweight KiCad PDM

2016-12-06 Thread Clemens Koller
Hello, Kevin! I fully support your ideas. In a commercial environment, a proper PDM including version management and documentation is mandatory to be able to deliver a product where you can realize a traceability down to the date code of a component once your design is manufactured. But since

Re: [Kicad-developers] Symbol library editor UI refactor

2016-12-06 Thread Maciej Sumiński
On 12/06/2016 09:10 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote: > Hi Nick, > > On 12/05/2016 11:46 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote: [snip] >> But I wonder if the filter should be able to also consider the library >> name. Currently it seems to only consider the parts. For example if I >> write the exact name for my libr

Re: [Kicad-developers] Github plugin not built in Ubuntu PPA

2016-12-06 Thread Carl Poirier
Hi Orson, Yes I am talking about the 4.0 branch. Thanks for the explanation. Carl On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 3:36 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote: > Hi Carl, > > Do you mean PPA for the 4.0 branch? Recently I had troubles building the > 4.0 branch with Github plugin enabled on Arch as well. > > Seemingl

Re: [Kicad-developers] Github plugin not built in Ubuntu PPA

2016-12-06 Thread Maciej Sumiński
Hi Carl, Do you mean PPA for the 4.0 branch? Recently I had troubles building the 4.0 branch with Github plugin enabled on Arch as well. Seemingly the problem is disabled SSLv3 support in Arch's OpenSSL package, which might be the case in Ubuntu as well. SSLv3 is used by avhttp to connect to Gith

Re: [Kicad-developers] Symbol library editor UI refactor

2016-12-06 Thread Maciej Sumiński
Hi Nick, On 12/05/2016 11:46 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote: > Hi Maciej, > > It looks quite good. It looks way more user friendly and the fact that > it updates instantly. I have not tested how it behaves if there are > parts with the same name. Currently the old rules apply, so if you have two comp

Re: [Kicad-developers] Symbol library editor UI refactor

2016-12-06 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, On 06.12.2016 09:03, Maciej Sumiński wrote: > Thank you Simon! Does it mean you have Windows binaries available for > testing? Yes: http://downloads.kicad-pcb.org/windows/testing/patched/kicad-patched-396-54c5f6b-x86_64.exe Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature _

Re: [Kicad-developers] Symbol library editor UI refactor

2016-12-06 Thread Maciej Sumiński
Thank you Simon! Does it mean you have Windows binaries available for testing? Regards, Orson On 12/05/2016 11:33 PM, Simon Richter wrote: > Hi, > > On 05.12.2016 17:52, Maciej Sumiński wrote: > >> Since some time we have been working on eeschema library editor with the >> goal of simplifying t