Re: [Kicad-developers] Stable version 4.0.5

Ok, lets continue the version string discussion in: [Kicad-developers] Version string updates. I just searched the bug tracker found a segfault in 4.0.4, but apparently it was also present in 4.0.1 for him. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1553804 2016-11-14 21:56 GMT+01:00 Nick Østerga

Re: [Kicad-developers] Stable version 4.0.5

2016-11-14 20:18 GMT+01:00 Wayne Stambaugh : > On 11/14/2016 1:37 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 12:59:53PM -0500, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >>> [snip] >>> Apparently package devs hate it because they >>> had remember to set the version and branch strings at config time when >>> b

Re: [Kicad-developers] Stable version 4.0.5

On 11/14/2016 1:37 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote: > On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 12:59:53PM -0500, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >> [snip] >> Apparently package devs hate it because they >> had remember to set the version and branch strings at config time when >> building from source archives otherwise they end up w

Re: [Kicad-developers] Stable version 4.0.5

On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 12:59:53PM -0500, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > [snip] > Apparently package devs hate it because they > had remember to set the version and branch strings at config time when > building from source archives otherwise they end up with no-vcs-found > version string. I see Chris ad

Re: [Kicad-developers] Stable version 4.0.5

On 11/14/2016 3:45 AM, Nick Østergaard wrote: > Den 14/11/2016 00.02 skrev "Wayne Stambaugh" >: >> >> On 11/13/2016 1:47 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote: >> > 2016-11-13 19:29 GMT+01:00 Wayne Stambaugh >: >> >> On 11/13/2016 1:15 PM, Nick Øster

Re: [Kicad-developers] Stable version 4.0.5

Den 14/11/2016 00.02 skrev "Wayne Stambaugh" : > > On 11/13/2016 1:47 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote: > > 2016-11-13 19:29 GMT+01:00 Wayne Stambaugh : > >> On 11/13/2016 1:15 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote: > >>> 2016-11-13 18:59 GMT+01:00 Wayne Stambaugh : > Hey Nick, > > The problem with the

Re: [Kicad-developers] Stable version 4.0.5

On 11/13/2016 1:47 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote: > 2016-11-13 19:29 GMT+01:00 Wayne Stambaugh : >> On 11/13/2016 1:15 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote: >>> 2016-11-13 18:59 GMT+01:00 Wayne Stambaugh : Hey Nick, The problem with the boost 1.61 bug fix in the master branch is that it includ

Re: [Kicad-developers] Stable version 4.0.5

2016-11-13 19:29 GMT+01:00 Wayne Stambaugh : > On 11/13/2016 1:15 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote: >> 2016-11-13 18:59 GMT+01:00 Wayne Stambaugh : >>> Hey Nick, >>> >>> The problem with the boost 1.61 bug fix in the master branch is that it >>> includes c++11 code. That's why I didn't merge it into the

Re: [Kicad-developers] Stable version 4.0.5

On 11/13/2016 1:15 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote: > 2016-11-13 18:59 GMT+01:00 Wayne Stambaugh : >> Hey Nick, >> >> The problem with the boost 1.61 bug fix in the master branch is that it >> includes c++11 code. That's why I didn't merge it into the stable >> branch. I want to avoid c++11 in the stab

Re: [Kicad-developers] Stable version 4.0.5

2016-11-13 18:59 GMT+01:00 Wayne Stambaugh : > Hey Nick, > > The problem with the boost 1.61 bug fix in the master branch is that it > includes c++11 code. That's why I didn't merge it into the stable > branch. I want to avoid c++11 in the stable 4 branch so we will have to > let package devs kno

Re: [Kicad-developers] Stable version 4.0.5

On 11/12/2016 2:15 PM, Michael Steinberg wrote: > Hi all, > >>> 1. Boost 1.61 compatibility and bugfix? >>> 2. Release version string. >>> >>> Should the release should include the boost 1.61 fix. It was >>> discussed in: >>> [Kicad-developers] About Bug 1604841: Pcbnew crash at moving via, and >>

Re: [Kicad-developers] Stable version 4.0.5

Hey Nick, The problem with the boost 1.61 bug fix in the master branch is that it includes c++11 code. That's why I didn't merge it into the stable branch. I want to avoid c++11 in the stable 4 branch so we will have to let package devs know that they cannot build kicad against boost >= 1.61. I

Re: [Kicad-developers] Stable version 4.0.5

Everyone take care of yourselves, alright? KiCad is important and awesome but we're in it for the long haul, and burnout or worse doesn't help anyone... On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote: > Should be fixed now. Wayne, both 7e3c025 and then b9c62b6 can go into > stable. Please

Re: [Kicad-developers] Stable version 4.0.5

Should be fixed now. Wayne, both 7e3c025 and then b9c62b6 can go into stable. Please have a look at them too, I'm not really firing on all cylinders today and don't want to be 100% responsible for patches pushed directly to stable... On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 03:45:51PM -0500, Chris Pavlina wrote: >

Re: [Kicad-developers] Stable version 4.0.5

Quick update: yes, I just pushed a "fix" for this in 7e3c025, and yes, I realize it may not apply to stable. Apologies, I'm very busy and preoccupied this morning. Give me some time and I will prepare a patch that applies against stable. On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 05:55:16PM +0100, Nick Østergaard wr

Re: [Kicad-developers] Stable version 4.0.5

2016-11-12 20:15 GMT+01:00 Michael Steinberg : > Hi all, > >>> 1. Boost 1.61 compatibility and bugfix? >>> 2. Release version string. >>> >>> Should the release should include the boost 1.61 fix. It was discussed >>> in: >>> [Kicad-developers] About Bug 1604841: Pcbnew crash at moving via, and >>>

Re: [Kicad-developers] Stable version 4.0.5

Hi all, 1. Boost 1.61 compatibility and bugfix? 2. Release version string. Should the release should include the boost 1.61 fix. It was discussed in: [Kicad-developers] About Bug 1604841: Pcbnew crash at moving via, and boost::context fixes to make it compatible with boost 1.61 And there is a

Re: [Kicad-developers] Stable version 4.0.5

[2] may be my fault, I will have a look shortly. Not sure who ate [3]. On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 05:55:16PM +0100, Nick Østergaard wrote: > Hi Wayne, > > Good news to see a new release, but I wonder about two things: > > 1. Boost 1.61 compatibility and bugfix? > 2. Release version string. > > Sho

Re: [Kicad-developers] Stable version 4.0.5

Hi Wayne, Good news to see a new release, but I wonder about two things: 1. Boost 1.61 compatibility and bugfix? 2. Release version string. Should the release should include the boost 1.61 fix. It was discussed in: [Kicad-developers] About Bug 1604841: Pcbnew crash at moving via, and boost::cont

[Kicad-developers] Stable version 4.0.5

This is the last call for patches to the 4 stable branch. If I don't hear anything, I will set version string and tag 4.0.5 in the stable branch on Sunday and give our library, doc, translation, and package devs a couple of weeks to prepare before I make the official announcement. Thanks, Wayne