Hi Gleb,
Thanks for your review and sorry for the delay reply since i was on my vacation.
On 12/23/2012 11:02 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 03:01:12PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>
>> +is_self_change_mapping = FNAME(is_self_change_mapping)(vcpu, addr,
>> +
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 11:41 -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Andy, Mike, can you confirm whether this fixes the percpu allocation
> failures when loading kvm.ko? TIA
monteverdi:~/:[1]# dmesg|grep PERCPU
[0.00] PERCPU: Embedded 27 pages/cpu @88047f80 s80704 r8192
d21696 u262144
mon
On 12/29/2012 01:52 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
>> This patch implements both userspace and vhost support for multiple queue
>> virtio-net (VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ). This is done by introducing an array of
>> VirtIONetQueue to VirtIONet.
>>
>> Signed-off-by:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 09:39:14PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > Avi Kivity (7):
> > > KVM: x86 emulator: framework for streamlining arithmetic opcodes
> > > KVM: x86 emulator: Support for declaring single operand fastops
> > > KVM: x86 emulator: introduce NoWrite flag
> > > KVM: x86 emula
Andy, Mike, can you confirm whether this fixes the percpu allocation
failures when loading kvm.ko? TIA
Use dynamic percpu allocations for the shared msrs structure,
to avoid using the limited reserved percpu space.
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x8
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 10:11:53AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > FreeBSD 9.1 with -smp 2.
> I cannot reproduce. I do see boot failure on the next branch with 9.[01]
> 64 bit -smp 2 here, but it is caused but segment registers been all
> incorrect on a secondary vcpu and this patch does not help. A
CPL is always 0 when in real mode, and always 3 when virtual 8086 mode.
Using values other than those can cause failures on operations that check CPL.
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 55dfc37..849f5f2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 04:57:41PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> This series goes on top of my previous one: "Fix
> emulate_invalid_guest_state=0 part 2". It does not only fixes bugs,
> but also does a nice cleanup of VMX real mode emulation. All real mode
> segment register mangling is now containe
On 20.12.2012, at 15:32, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here's the next iteration of the host patches to support channel
> I/O against kvm/next.
>
> Changes from v4 are on the style side; mainly using defines instead
> of magic numbers and using helper functions for decoding instructions.
>
>
On 18.12.2012, at 08:53, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Previously we silently exited, with subclasses we got an opcode warning.
> Instead explicitly tell the user what's wrong.
>
> An indication for this is -cpu ? showing "host" with an all-zero PVR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber
> ---
> target-
Il 02/01/2013 06:03, Rusty Russell ha scritto:
> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>> The virtqueue_add_buf function has two limitations:
>>
>> 1) it requires the caller to provide all the buffers in a single call;
>>
>> 2) it does not support chained scatterlists: the buffers must be
>> provided as an array
On 01/02/2013 01:03 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>> The virtqueue_add_buf function has two limitations:
>>
>> 1) it requires the caller to provide all the buffers in a single call;
>>
>> 2) it does not support chained scatterlists: the buffers must be
>> provided as an array of
On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 09:36:38PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 03:33:16PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 11:25:24AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 07:25:49AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 0
13 matches
Mail list logo
