Re: [PATCH] [RFC] KVM test: Control files automatic generation to save memory

2010-02-18 Thread Michael Goldish
- "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues" wrote: > On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 12:07 -0500, Michael Goldish wrote: > > - "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues" wrote: > > > > > As our configuration system generates a list of dicts > > > with test parameters, and that list might be potentially > > > *very* large, kee

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] KVM test: Control files automatic generation to save memory

2010-02-18 Thread Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 12:07 -0500, Michael Goldish wrote: > - "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues" wrote: > > > As our configuration system generates a list of dicts > > with test parameters, and that list might be potentially > > *very* large, keeping all this information in memory might > > be a prob

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] KVM test: Control files automatic generation to save memory

2010-02-14 Thread Dor Laor
On 02/14/2010 07:07 PM, Michael Goldish wrote: - "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues" wrote: As our configuration system generates a list of dicts with test parameters, and that list might be potentially *very* large, keeping all this information in memory might be a problem for smaller virtualizat

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] KVM test: Control files automatic generation to save memory

2010-02-14 Thread Michael Goldish
- "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues" wrote: > As our configuration system generates a list of dicts > with test parameters, and that list might be potentially > *very* large, keeping all this information in memory might > be a problem for smaller virtualization hosts due to > the memory pressure cre

[PATCH] [RFC] KVM test: Control files automatic generation to save memory

2010-02-10 Thread Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
As our configuration system generates a list of dicts with test parameters, and that list might be potentially *very* large, keeping all this information in memory might be a problem for smaller virtualization hosts due to the memory pressure created. Tests made on my 4GB laptop show that most of t