Jesse Barnes wrote:
Hm, that's not the answer I was hoping for. :) (Was looking for,
Yeah we just need this bits queued and we'll send an update for
e1000 right away. :)
I really don't want the SR-IOV stuff to sit out another merge cycle
though... Arg.
We will have drivers that support
On Wednesday, December 17, 2008 6:15 am Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03:23:53PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
I applied 1-9 to my linux-next branch; and at least patch #10 needs a
respin,
I still object to #2. We should have the flexibility to have 'struct
resource's that
A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 08:44:03AM -0800, Rose, Gregory V wrote:
As noted in the attached email to the netdev list, we (e1000_devel) will
support the API.
Great, will you have patches for the existing e1000 drivers soon to use
it? Or
; randy.dun...@oracle.com; rdre...@cisco.com;
ho...@verge.net.au; ying...@kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
kvm@vger.kernel.org; virtualizat...@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/13 v7] PCI: Linux kernel SR-IOV support
On Friday, November 21, 2008 10:36 am Yu Zhao wrote
On Wednesday, December 17, 2008 3:42 am Fischer, Anna wrote:
I have two minor comments on this topic.
1) Currently the PF driver is called before the kernel initializes VFs and
their resources, and the current API does not allow the PF driver to
detect that easily if the allocation of the VFs
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Barnes [mailto:jbar...@virtuousgeek.org]
On Wednesday, December 17, 2008 8:44 am Rose, Gregory V wrote:
As noted in the attached email to the netdev list, we (e1000_devel) will
support the API.
Do you think you'll have those changes ready for 2.6.29?
On Wednesday, December 17, 2008 8:44 am Rose, Gregory V wrote:
As noted in the attached email to the netdev list, we (e1000_devel) will
support the API.
Do you think you'll have those changes ready for 2.6.29? Would merging core
SR-IOV support now make that any more likely?
Thanks,
Jesse
--
-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/13 v7] PCI: Linux kernel SR-IOV support
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:37:54AM +0800, Jike Song wrote:
Jesse Barnes wrote:
Given a respin of 10-13 I think it's reasonable to merge this into 2.6.29,
but
I'd be much happier about it if we got some driver code
Rose, Gregory V wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Barnes [mailto:jbar...@virtuousgeek.org]
On Wednesday, December 17, 2008 8:44 am Rose, Gregory V wrote:
As noted in the attached email to the netdev list, we (e1000_devel) will
support the API.
Do you think you'll have
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Which dom0 kernel are you using? Is it based on my pvops-based dom0 work?
The kernel I'm currently using is an ad-hoc patchwork of changes to the 2.6.18
Xen Dom0 kernel that was available back in August. The folks from OTC in Intel
(Zhao Yu and his team) would
On Wednesday, December 17, 2008 11:05 am Rose, Gregory V wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Barnes [mailto:jbar...@virtuousgeek.org]
On Wednesday, December 17, 2008 8:44 am Rose, Gregory V wrote:
As noted in the attached email to the netdev list, we (e1000_devel) will
support
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03:23:53PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
I applied 1-9 to my linux-next branch; and at least patch #10 needs a respin,
I still object to #2. We should have the flexibility to have 'struct
resource's that are not in this array in the pci_dev. I would like to
see the SR-IOV
On Wednesday, December 17, 2008 11:51 am Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:42:54AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
I really don't want the SR-IOV stuff to sit out another merge cycle
though... Arg.
Why, is there some rush to get it in? As there is no in-kernel users of
it, I don't see
Fischer, Anna wrote:
I have two minor comments on this topic.
1) Currently the PF driver is called before the kernel initializes VFs and
their resources, and the current API does not allow the PF driver to
detect that easily if the allocation of the VFs and their resources
has succeeded or not.
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03:23:53PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
I applied 1-9 to my linux-next branch; and at least patch #10 needs a respin,
I still object to #2. We should have the flexibility to have 'struct
resource's that are not in this array in the pci_dev. I
Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Wednesday, December 17, 2008 11:51 am Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:42:54AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
I really don't want the SR-IOV stuff to sit out another merge cycle
though... Arg.
Why, is there some rush to get it in? As there is no in-kernel users of
...@verge.net.au; ying...@kernel.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org;
virtualizat...@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/13 v7] PCI: Linux kernel SR-IOV support
Fischer, Anna wrote:
I have two minor comments on this topic.
1) Currently the PF driver
On Friday, November 21, 2008 10:36 am Yu Zhao wrote:
Greetings,
Following patches are intended to support SR-IOV capability in the
Linux kernel. With these patches, people can turn a PCI device with
the capability into multiple ones from software perspective, which
will benefit KVM and
Jesse Barnes wrote:
Given a respin of 10-13 I think it's reasonable to merge this into 2.6.29,
but
I'd be much happier about it if we got some driver code along with it, so as
not to have an unused interface sitting around for who knows how many
releases. Is that reasonable? Do you know
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:37:54AM +0800, Jike Song wrote:
Jesse Barnes wrote:
Given a respin of 10-13 I think it's reasonable to merge this into 2.6.29,
but
I'd be much happier about it if we got some driver code along with it, so
as
not to have an unused interface sitting around
Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:37:54AM +0800, Jike Song wrote:
Jesse Barnes wrote:
Given a respin of 10-13 I think it's reasonable to merge this into 2.6.29, but
I'd be much happier about it if we got some driver code along with it, so as
not to have an unused interface sitting
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 03:07:23PM +0800, Zhao, Yu wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:37:54AM +0800, Jike Song wrote:
Jesse Barnes wrote:
Given a respin of 10-13 I think it's reasonable to merge this into
2.6.29, but I'd be much happier about it if we got some driver code
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 02:36:05AM +0800, Yu Zhao wrote:
Greetings,
Following patches are intended to support SR-IOV capability in the
Linux kernel. With these patches, people can turn a PCI device with
the capability into multiple ones from software perspective, which
will benefit KVM and
Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 02:36:05AM +0800, Yu Zhao wrote:
Greetings,
Following patches are intended to support SR-IOV capability in the
Linux kernel. With these patches, people can turn a PCI device with
the capability into multiple ones from software perspective, which
will
24 matches
Mail list logo
