From: Rik van Riel
These wrapper functions allow architecture code (eg. ARM) to keep
calling context_tracking_user_enter & context_tracking_user_exit
the same way it always has, without error prone tricks like duplicate
defines of argument values in assembly code.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel
--
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 09:41:45AM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Rik van Riel
>
> These wrapper functions allow architecture code (eg. ARM) to keep
> calling context_tracking_user_enter & context_tracking_user_exit
> the same way it always has, without error prone tricks like duplicate
>
On 02/10/2015 10:28 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 09:41:45AM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
>> From: Rik van Riel
>>
>> These wrapper functions allow architecture code (eg. ARM) to keep
>> calling context_tracking_user_enter & context_tracking_user_exit
>> the same way it
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:48:37AM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 02/10/2015 10:28 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 09:41:45AM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
> >> From: Rik van Riel
> >>
> >> These wrapper functions allow architecture code (eg. ARM) to keep
> >> calling c
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 09:25:26AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:48:37AM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On 02/10/2015 10:28 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 09:41:45AM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
> > >> From: Rik van Riel
> > >>
> > >> Th
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 06:36:47PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 09:25:26AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:48:37AM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > On 02/10/2015 10:28 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 09:41:4