From: "Michael S. Tsirkin"
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:42:05 +0200
> vhost checked the counter within the refcnt before decrementing. It
> really wanted to know that it is the one that has the last reference, as
> a way to batch freeing resources a bit more efficiently.
>
> Note: we only let refc
On 02/13/2014 05:42 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> vhost checked the counter within the refcnt before decrementing. It
> really wanted to know that it is the one that has the last reference, as
> a way to batch freeing resources a bit more efficiently.
>
> Note: we only let refcount go to 0 on de
vhost checked the counter within the refcnt before decrementing. It
really wanted to know that it is the one that has the last reference, as
a way to batch freeing resources a bit more efficiently.
Note: we only let refcount go to 0 on device release.
This works well but we now access the ref co
