Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] option to not remove files inside -mem-path dir (v2)

2012-07-03 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 04:54:03PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 07:56:58PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 03:06:32PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > > Resending series, after fixing some coding style issues. Does anybody has > > > any > >

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] option to not remove files inside -mem-path dir (v2)

2012-07-02 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 07:56:58PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 03:06:32PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > Resending series, after fixing some coding style issues. Does anybody has > > any > > feedback about this proposal? > > > > Changes v1 -> v2: > > - Coding st

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] option to not remove files inside -mem-path dir (v2)

2012-07-02 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 03:06:32PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > Resending series, after fixing some coding style issues. Does anybody has any > feedback about this proposal? > > Changes v1 -> v2: > - Coding style fixes > > Original cover letter: > > I was investigating if there are any mecha

[RFC PATCH 0/6] option to not remove files inside -mem-path dir (v2)

2012-07-02 Thread Eduardo Habkost
Resending series, after fixing some coding style issues. Does anybody has any feedback about this proposal? Changes v1 -> v2: - Coding style fixes Original cover letter: I was investigating if there are any mechanisms that allow manually pinning of guest RAM to specific host NUMA nodes, in the