2015-04-17 19:12+0200, Jan Kiszka:
> On 2015-04-17 18:43, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> > 2015-04-13 07:16+0200, Jan Kiszka:
> >> PS: If someone has a good idea for a simple test case on machines
> >> without IOMMU (like my current boxes), thus without a chance to use
> >> device pass-through to stress gue
On 2015-04-17 18:43, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2015-04-13 07:16+0200, Jan Kiszka:
>> PS: If someone has a good idea for a simple test case on machines
>> without IOMMU (like my current boxes), thus without a chance to use
>> device pass-through to stress guest PAT settings, I would be all ears.
>
> No
2015-04-13 07:16+0200, Jan Kiszka:
> Hi all,
>
> while digging into the PAT topic for Jailhouse, I also wondered how KVM
> deals with it. And I'm still not getting it complete - or there is a bug:
>
> KVM intercepts all guest writes to the PAT MSR and instead keeps the
> guest value in vcpu->arch
Hi all,
while digging into the PAT topic for Jailhouse, I also wondered how KVM
deals with it. And I'm still not getting it complete - or there is a bug:
KVM intercepts all guest writes to the PAT MSR and instead keeps the
guest value in vcpu->arch.pat. But, besides returning that value back on
r